Back
KARDAK ETE
Rei Taha S/o Shri Rei Talo – Appellant
Versus
Biki Tania @ Tanya Higang S/o Late Biki Tacha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KARDAK ETE, J.
1. Heard Mr. K. Tama, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. Sonar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
2. By filing this revision petition, the petitioners have assailed the competence of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ziro, with reference to territorial as well as pecuniary jurisdiction in entertaining of the Title Suit being T.S. No. 19/2023 by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ziro, on the ground of violation of Section 14 of the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Court Act, 2021 as the competent Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Palin, Kra Daadi District is available at Ziro. Petitioners have also challenged the order dated 26.03.2024 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ziro in T.S. No. 19/2023 and prays for return of T.S. No. 19/2023 for filing before the appropriate Civil Judge (Junior Division).
3. The case, in brief, is that the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4/plaintiffs, have jointly filed a Title Suit being T. S. No. 19/2023 before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ziro, praying for declaration of right, title and interest for the post of President, General Secretary, Vice President and Assistant General Secretary of Al
Jurisdictional objections in civil suits must be raised promptly, and suits undervalued must be filed in the appropriate court as per statutory provisions.
The court established that jurisdictional objections must be raised promptly, and a suit undervalued must be filed in the appropriate lower court as per the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Court Act, 2021.
The failure to object to a trial court's jurisdiction waives the right to contest such jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. Supervisory jurisdiction should be exercised sparingly and n....
Point of Law - By amendment in the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 the limit of pecuniary jurisdiction of small causes court was increased from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.1 Lakh.
The court ruled that the learned District Judge exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside a village authority's decision and allowing a fresh plaint, which constituted a new suit.
A Title Suit filed without jurisdiction cannot lead to valid execution; the doctrine of lis pendens binds subsequent purchasers to existing litigation outcomes.
Civil courts retain jurisdiction to adjudicate on matters showing procedural irregularities in revenue court decisions, even if some claims are governed by the OLR Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
