KALYAN RAI SURANA, SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Mahammad Ali, Son of Makbul Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[SOUMITRA SAIKIA, J.]
The writ petition is directed against the order passed on 31.08.2023 by the Member of the Foreigner’s Tribunal, 4th Darrang, Mangaldai, in FT 4th Case No. 618/SPR/2017. In this order, the Tribunal affirmed the State's reference against the petitioner, concluding that the petitioner had failed to discharge the burden under Section 9 of the Foreigner’s Act, 1946. The Tribunal opined that the petitioner could not prove that he was born to genuine Indian parents and had acquired Indian citizenship by birth. As a result, the petitioner was declared a foreigner/illegal migrant of post 25.03.1971, leading to the filing of this writ petition challenging the Tribunal's opinion
2. Before the Tribunal, the petitioner submitted his written statements along with supporting documents. The petitioner himself appeared as DW1 and also presented two other witnesses, DW2 and DW3. In total, the petitioner exhibited 19 documents, including his voter identity card, in support of his case before the Tribunal.
3. Ultimately, the Tribunal rejected the case presented by the petitioner and, accordingly, answered the reference in the affirmative, declaring the petitioner a foreign
The burden of proof lies on the petitioner to establish citizenship, and mere document production is insufficient without proper evidence.
Merely because documents were collected by petitioner during pendency of reference, it cannot be a ground to ignore same as documents have to be examined as regards the genuineness, authenticity, rel....
Point of Law : Merely because of certain discrepancy in the name would not render a person to be liable to be declared as a foreigner.
The burden of proof for citizenship lies with the individual, requiring reliable evidence and clear documentation to establish claims.
Illegal immigrant - Declaration as foreigner - petitioner's father and his grandfather were in-possession of certain property in Assam before 1971 - corroborating evidences to show that the petitione....
Discrepancies in names should not automatically render evidence inadmissible, particularly when live witnesses can corroborate lineage, requiring fair procedural questioning.
The burden lies on the petitioner to provide reliable evidence establishing citizenship, which was not met, leading to the declaration of foreign status.
The judgment reinforces the necessity of adequate evidence in citizenship claims and the implications of procedural lapses in legal proceedings.
The burden of proof for establishing citizenship lies with the individual, requiring substantial evidence beyond mere documentation.
The burden of proof concerning citizenship rests with the individual asserting citizenship; insufficient evidence leads to the designation as a foreigner, reaffirming that mere document submission is....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.