ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Bijoy Munda S/O Lt. Diya Munda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Arun Dev Choudhury, J.
1. Heard Mr. K Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B Sarma, learned Addl. PP, Assam.
2. The present criminal revision petition is filed assailing the judgment and order dated 22.04.2013, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.39(S-3)/2012, arising out of GR Case No.100/2016, under sections 447/323/324/326/34 IPC, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge though set aside the conviction of the petitioner for offence under section 324/326/34 IPC passed by the learned JMFC, Biswanath Chariali but conviction and sentence awarded by the learned trial court to the petitioners under sections 447/323/34 IPC was upheld.
3. The prosecution case in a nutshell is that on 21.02.2006 one Bipul Behera son of Sutku Behera of village Amjarani under Gohpur PS lodged an FIR alleging that all the FIR names accused came to their house with Dao and Lathi in their hands and beaten him along with his family members and caused injury.
4. On receipt of the FIR, Gahpur PS Case No.28/06 under sections 447/323/34 IPC was registered and on completion of the investigation the I/O submitted charge sheet against the accused pers
The court emphasized the importance of considering the rehabilitative purpose of sentencing under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, especially for first-time offenders.
The court ruled that proper consideration under the Probation of Offenders Act is essential, especially for first-time offenders in non-heinous cases.
The court emphasized the importance of considering probation for first-time offenders, prioritizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 during sentencing, highlighting the need for discretion based on the nature of the offence and the offender's b....
The court emphasized the importance of considering the offender's background and the nature of the offence when exercising discretion in sentencing under the Probation of Offenders Act.
The court emphasized the importance of discretion in sentencing, allowing probation for first-time offenders in non-heinous cases.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 in sentencing, highlighting that sentencing should focus on reform rather than punishment.
The court emphasized the rehabilitative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, asserting that first-time offenders should be considered for probation to promote reform rather than punishment.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 in sentencing, especially for first-time offenders, to promote rehabilitation over punishment.
The court emphasized that sentencing should consider individual circumstances and not be mechanical, allowing probation for first-time offenders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.