ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Parag Borag, S/O Sri Jiten Borah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Arun Dev Choudhury, J.
1. Heard Mr. N Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
2. The present application is filed assailing a judgment and order dated 29.06.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class in GR case No. 2/2009 convicting and sentencing the petitioner to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 6 months under Section 324 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer another one month of Simple Imprisonment.
3. Aforesaid judgment and sentence was challenged by the petitioner before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Biswanath Chariali in Criminal Appeal No. 18(S-3)/2011. The said appeal also met with the same fate, however, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Biswanath Chariali convicted the accused petitioner under Section 447 of IPC and sentenced him to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further Simple Imprisonment of 15 days. The aforesaid two judgments are challenged before this Court.
4. The prosecution story in a nutshell is that on 31.12.2008 at aroun
The court emphasized the importance of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 during sentencing, highlighting the need for discretion based on the nature of the offence and the offender's b....
The court emphasized the importance of considering probation for first-time offenders, prioritizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court ruled that proper consideration under the Probation of Offenders Act is essential, especially for first-time offenders in non-heinous cases.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the rehabilitative purpose of sentencing under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, especially for first-time offenders.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 in sentencing, highlighting that sentencing should focus on reform rather than punishment.
The court emphasized that sentencing should consider individual circumstances and not be mechanical, allowing probation for first-time offenders.
The court emphasized the importance of discretion in sentencing, allowing probation for first-time offenders in non-heinous cases.
The court emphasized the rehabilitative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, asserting that first-time offenders should be considered for probation to promote reform rather than punishment.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the offender's background and the nature of the offence when exercising discretion in sentencing under the Probation of Offenders Act.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 in sentencing, especially for first-time offenders, to promote rehabilitation over punishment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.