SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1598

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, KOHIMA BENCH
Manish Choudhury, J.
Shri Besu Ashurhu S/O Besu - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent
Bail Appln./26/2024
Decided On : 13-12-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Krovi Tsukru
For the Respondent: P.P, Nagaland

IMPORTANT POINT
The court emphasized that bail for serious drug offences requires clear evidence of innocence and is subject to stringent statutory conditions.

Headnote:

(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 24, 29, and 60 - Bail application for accused in connection with commercial quantity of contraband - The accused was found in possession of 489 grams of heroin, classified as commercial quantity under the NDPS Act - The court emphasized the stringent conditions under Section 37 for granting bail, requiring reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty - The court found no merit in the bail application and dismissed it. (Paras 6, 7, 17)

(B) Bail - Conditions for grant - The court reiterated that the satisfaction regarding the accused's guilt must be based on reasonable grounds, which are more than prima facie grounds, and must consider the seriousness of the offence. (Paras 10, 11)

ORDER :

Manish Choudhury, J.

Heard Ms. Krovi Tsukru, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Livika, learned Public Prosecutor, Nagaland for the respondent.

2. The present application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita [BNSS] Act, 2023 is preferred by the petitioner seeking bail in respect of the accused viz. L. Manio in connection with Special Case no. 40 of 2024 arising out of Narcotic Police Station Case no. 14 of 2024 registered for the offences under Section 24[c], Section 29 and Section 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances [NDPS] Act, 1985.

3. At the inception, it is appropriate to narrate the events, in brief, leading to the registration of Narcotic Police Station Case no. 14 of 2024.

3.1. On 16.08.2024, one UBSI named Zasilie Angami of the Narcotic Cell Police Station, Police Head Quarter, Nagaland, Kohima was detailed for MVCP duty along with other staff. During the period of MVCP duty in between Khuzama and Viswma, near Agri-link road, Khuzama village, a vehicle bearing Registration no. NL-01/H-1658 [Ford Figo Exi Duratec/Diamond] [‘the subject-vehicle’, for short] was intercepted at around 11-00/11-20 hours while the subject-vehicle was proceeding towards Kohima from Manipur side. On intercepting the subject-vehicle, suspicious materials, suspected to be contraband, were detected inside the subject-vehicle. Information was immediately given to superior officers. Independent witnesses from the District Administration and Gazetted Police Officer were also called to the scene to conduct search and seizure. The subject-vehicle was checked in presence of witnesses. During the search of the subject-vehicle, contraband substance, suspected to be Heroin, packed in 40 soap boxes were found concealed inside one green coloured backpack which was kept in the rear seat of the subject-vehicle. Accordingly, the suspected contraband were duly seized in presence of independent witnesses and the Gazetted Officer. The packets suspected contraband [Heroin] were weighed separately, with and without the soap box cover, and the total weight of the seized contraband [Heroin] was found to be approximately 489 grams without the soap box covers and the entire proceeding was videographed. The packets of the contraband [Heroin] were then serially marked, packed, sealed and seized and the same were attested by the independent witnesses, Gazetted Officer and the accused persons.

3.2. The seized contraband along with the subject-vehicle with ignition key and vehicle documents were listed in a seizure memo and thereafter, were seized from the possession of the accused persons. The seizure procedure stated to have started at 11-45 hours and ended at 16-30 hours. The subject-vehicle was found to have three occupants – [i] Manizuo; [ii] Kayikho Solomon; and [iii] Manio [arrested accused person present here].

4. Ms. Tsukru, learned counsel appearing for the accused person, L. Manio has submitted that the accused is a patient suffering from serious chest pain and breathing issue caused due to an accident the accused met a year back. With such projection, Ms. Tsukru has submitted that the accused, L. Manio may be allowed to go on bail subject to imposition of terms and conditions found appropriate by this Court. On being so released on bail, the accused, L. Manio would assist and cooperate in the further investigation of the case.

5. Ms. Livika, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently objected to the prayer for release of the accused, L. Manio. Ms. Livika has further submitted that the rigors of Section 37, NDPS Act cannot be relaxed on such ground. She has, thus, vehemently objected to the prayer for bail to the accused, L. Manio on the ground that he having found in possession of contraband [Heroin] of commercial quantity is entitled to be released at this stage of investigation.

6. Mention of Heroin is found in Entry no. 56 in the Table appended to the NDPS Act, 1985 issued in terms (viia) an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top