Back
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Itanagar Club A Society Registered Under The Socienties Registration Act, 1860 Extension To Ap Act, 1978 Through Its Secretary Shri Doya Boje – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. Through The Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Heard Mr. K. Lollen, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Kamduk, learned standing counsel for the Land Management Department appearing for respondent No. 1 to 4 and Ms. P. Pangu, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No. 5.
2. The petitioner society by way of instituting the present proceeding has assailed the action on the part of the respondent authorities in not issuing formal order of land allotment to the petitioner society and also the subsequent action of cancellation of the approval so granted by the competent authority for effecting such allotment in favour of the petitioner society. The petitioners have also challenged the land allotment orders issued in respect of the respondent Nos. 6 & 7 herein which is contended to have been so made from the plot of land which was initially approved to be so allotted to the petitioner society.
3. As projected in the writ petition, the petitioner society was initially established with the name “Officers Club”. Thereafter, it was registered on 03.06.1985 under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 in the same and style of “Officers Club”. It is contended that the membe
The court ruled that land allotments within a wildlife sanctuary require proper authority and compliance with legal procedures, rendering unauthorized allotments void.
The Divisional Commissioner had the power to examine and cancel the transfer of land, and the petitioner-Society had no legal right to claim allotment of land based on the Trust's decision.
before making the allotment the State Authorities were required to set apart the land for access to the lands of the khatedar tenants, their dhani and the public utilities and the entries
Petitioners cannot assert rights for land allotments when their claims are contingent on another party's pending applications, especially after such approvals have expired.
The allotment of land to the respondent companies was illegal and violative of the provisions of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, and the Rules made thereunder.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
