SANGEET LODHA, RAMESHWAR VYAS
Kalyan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the appeal cases (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the writ petitions filed (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. responses from the state and esucrl (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. appellants' arguments regarding land allotment (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. state's arguments in defense of allocation (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. further defense by areprl on allotment validity (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. critical analysis on procedural adherence (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. legal principles regarding public utility lands (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. observations on appellants' plea validity (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. court's authority on jurisdictional issues (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 11. allegations of violation of rights reviewed (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 12. conclusions drawn on appellant claims (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 13. land access and public utility preservation (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 14. critical examination of the land row (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 15. land allotment rules and public interest (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 16. respresentation of natural resource safeguarding (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 17. final observations on the legal questions (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 18. conclusion on the appeals and orders (Para 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 19. final order regarding land allotment |
Abdul Rahman vs. State of Rajasthan
Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India
Bharat Singh vs. State of Haryana
Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee & Anr. vs. C.K.Rajan & Ors. : (2003) 7 SCC 546
Hinch Lal Tiwari vs. Kamla Devi & Ors
Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil vs. Dr. Mahesh Madhav Gosavi & Ors.
The allotment of land to the respondent companies was illegal and violative of the provisions of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, and the Rules made thereunder.
before making the allotment the State Authorities were required to set apart the land for access to the lands of the khatedar tenants, their dhani and the public utilities and the entries
The court emphasized the need for local authorities' input in land allotment decisions to ensure compliance with community needs and statutory obligations.
The court upheld the validity of the land allotment for a project of national importance and found it to be in accordance with Rule 7 of the Rajasthan Tenancy (Government) Rules, 1955.
The judgment establishes the importance of proving actual land allotment and possession in cases of rehabilitation schemes and the validity of administrative orders changing land use.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.