SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1656

DEVASHIS BARUAH
Nalinaksha Sarma, S/o- Lt. L. K. Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D. Upamanya, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. S.C. Keyal, SC, Income Tax

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. D. Upamanya, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner. Mr. S.C. Keyal, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the notice dated 15.03.2022 issued under Section 148A (b) of the Income Tax Act 1961, for short (‘the Act of 1961’); the order dated 31.03.2022 passed under Section 148A (d) of the Act of 1961, as well as all consequential actions in pursuance to the order dated 31.03.2022.

3. From the materials on record, it appears that on 15.03.2022, a notice was issued under section 148A (b) of the Act of 1961, asking the petitioner to show cause as to why a notice under Section 148 of the Act of 1961 should not be issued in view of the details contained in Annexure A to the said notice dated 15.03.2022. It is pertinent to mention that the said notice was issued in connection to the Assessment Year 2015-16.

4. A perusal of Annexure A to the said notice dated the 15.03.2022, reveals that information were gathered from the inside portal for the financial year 2014-15, that there were various deposits in the form of TDS statement, time deposit as w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top