SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1696

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.
Anita Saikia W/o Shri Pinku Moni Saikia – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 483 of 2022
Decided On : 20-11-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: P.K. Roychoudhury, G. Deka, N.G. Kundu
For the Respondent: P. Nayak

IMPORTANT POINT
Promotion from non-gazetted to gazetted posts requires statutory provisions; absence of such rules denies entitlement to promotion.

Headnote:

(A) Assam Technician Establishment Service Rules, 2015 - Promotion - The petitioner, having served as Electrician for 28 years, sought promotion to Junior Engineer based on qualifications. The court noted that existing service rules do not permit such promotion from Electrician (non-gazetted) to Junior Engineer (gazetted). The petitioner's claims were unsupported by statutory provisions, and the draft rules had not been notified. (Paras 12, 16, 22)

(B) Administrative Discretion - The court emphasized that the government has the discretion to amend service rules and that employees cannot claim promotions outside the established rules. (Paras 20, 22)

Facts of the case:

The petitioner, after obtaining a B.E. degree, sought promotion to Junior Engineer but was denied due to lack of statutory provisions allowing such promotion from her current post.

Findings of Court:

The court found no legal basis for the petitioner's promotion claim, citing the absence of notified rules and the discretionary power of the government.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to promotion based on her qualifications despite the lack of statutory provisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that without statutory rules, the government retains discretion over promotions, and employees cannot claim rights to promotions outside established rules.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.

1. Heard Mr. P.K. Roy Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, learned standing counsel for the PWD representing all the respondents.

2. In brief, the case of the petitioner is that she had obtained Diploma in Electrical Engineering in the year 1991 from Nagaon Polytechnic. She claims to have been regularly appointed as Electrician under Electrical Section-IV under PWD Jorhat Electrical Sub-Division vide order dated 01.04.1996 issued by the Executive Engineer, PWD, Jorhat Electrical Division for a period of 3 (three) months and posted in the office of the Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD Electrical Sub-Division, Jorhat. It is also projected that by order dated 09.07.1996, issued by the Executive Engineer, PWD, Jorhat Electrical Division, the service of the petitioner was continued till further orders purportedly in terms of order passed by this Court in CR No. 3034/1996.

3. Her further case is that after obtaining study leave, which was sanctioned vide notification dated 15.02.2005 by the Deputy Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, PWD (Estt.B) Branch, which was extended on 08.11.2007, the petitioner had obtained B.E. (Electrical) Degree from the Jorhat Engineering College. Thereafter, on 12.12.2008, she had submitted an application before the Commissioner & Special Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, PWD with a request to promote her to the post of Assistant Engineer. As the petitioner’s prayer and subsequent representations were not considered, the petitioner had approached this Court by filing W.P. (C) 4029/2012. By order dated 22.11.2012, the said writ petition was disposed of by directing the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, P.W. (NH & Building) Department to consider the grant of stagnation benefit to the petitioner w.e.f. the date of completion of 10 (ten) years of service in the post of Electrician, if found entitled to. By order dated 05.10.2013, passed by the Executive Engineer, PWD, Jorhat Electrical Division, the service of the petitioner as Electrician was regularized in the vacant post which she was holding since 01.09.1996.

4. On 25.10.2013, the petitioner had submitted a representation for upgradation to a rank that suits her qualification if there is any vacant post, which was followed by representation dated 30.01.2014 and 21.03.2014 to the Commissioner & Special Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, PWD (Building & NH).

5. As nothing happened, the petitioner had again approached this Court and by filing W.P. (C) 5252/2015, she had prayed for a direction to the respondents to promote her to the post of Junior Engineer. This Court by order dated 05.08.2019, disposed of the said writ petition by directing the respondent department to consider the case of the petitioner and take necessary action subject to prevailing law to promote the petitioner to the post of Jr. Engineer and to that effect, to examine all the cogent reasons to be urged by the petitioner before the competent authority by way of her representation and to dispose of the representation to be made by the petitioner before the concerned authority of the department, if possible within 3 (three) months from the date of the order by a speaking order. Accordingly, the said writ petition was disposed of.

6. The petitioner had served copy of the said order dated 05.08.2019, passed by this Court in WP (C) 5252/2015. However, the Deputy Security to the Govt. of Assam, PWD (Bldg. & NH), Estt. Branch requested the petitioner to submit a petition before the competent authority urging the cogent reason for disposing of her representation seeking promotion to the post of Junior Engineer (Electrical). The aggrieved petitioner had again approached this Court by filing W.P. (C) 1868/2020 and this Court by order dated 11.03.2020, disposed of the said writ petition by directing that the petitioner will have to first file a representation in term of order dated 05.08.2019 and thereafter, the competent autho

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top