SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 225

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 
ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.
Manmohan Bharali, S/o. Late Prabhat Bharali – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Principal Secretary To The Government And Ors. – Respondent
WP(C) 6226 of 2022 
Decided On : 11-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M. Bhagabati, Ms. M. Gogoi, Ms. B. Talukdar, Ms. G. Bora
For the Respondent: Sc., P. And R.D., GA, Assam

Promotion eligibility governed by current administrative rules; previous qualifications irrelevant after absorption into new regulations.

Headnote:(A) Assam Ministerial District Establishment Service Rules, 1967 - Rule 6; Assam Directorate Establishment (Ministerial) Service Rules, 1973 - Rule 10(3); Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 - Section 62(1), Section 140(1) - Petition for promotion from Grade-IV to Grade-III denied due to absence of eligibility as per P&RD Department rules post absorption. Court found that promotions were governed by new rules and the petitioner was not similarly situated to those promoted. The petitioner had made numerous representations for promotion. (Paras 2, 20, 24)

(B) Promotion Criteria - Eligibility for promotion is determined by the fulfillment of educational qualifications and duration of service as set under specified rules; however, once a new governing law is enacted, it overrides prior eligibility criteria.

(C) Administrative Procedures - Absorption into a new department under different regulations leads to a re-evaluation of promotional eligibility according to the current governing laws (Paras 4, 10, 23).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner served as a Grade-IV Peon and passed the necessary examinations for promotion but was denied promotion despite fulfilling the required criteria. In 2016, others were promoted, but he was overlooked due to being absorbed later into the P&RD.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner did not qualify for promotion under the newly enacted P&RD rules, which specify that promotions must be made by a recruitment process per the Assam Panchayat Act, negating prior eligibility claims.

Issues: The key issues were whether the petitioner was entitled to promotion under the old rules and whether being absorbed under new rules affected his eligibility.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner’s claims under previous rules are invalidated by his absorption into the P&RD Department governed by newer laws. Promotion requirements must follow the most current regulations as established by the Assam Act.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.

1. Heard Mr. M. Bhagabati, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat and Rural Development Department (P&RD).

2. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner for ventilating his grievance that although he fulfilled the requisite criteria for promotion from Grade-IV to Grade-III post under the Panchayat and Rural Development Department (In short, ‘P&RD’), Government of Assam, the Petitioner has not been promoted, despite submission of several representations by him praying for his promotion, in violation of Rule 6 of the Assam Ministerial District Establishment Service Rules 1967 as well as Rule 10 (3) of the Assam Directorate Establishment (Ministerial) Service Rules, 1973 which provide for provisions relating to promotion of Grade-IV personnel to Grade-III posts.

3. The case of the Petitioner is that he is serving in Grade-IV post of Peon in the Office of Madhupur Anchalik Panchayat under Nalbari Zilla Parishad, Nalbari which comes under the P&RD Department, Government of Assam. The Petitioner was initially engaged as a Peon for three (3) months in District Rural Development Agency (In short ‘DRDA’), Nalbari by the Project Director on daily wage basis, vide an order dated 05.11.1992. However, his service was extended from time to time by different orders issued by the DRDA. The service of the Petitioner was regularized as a Peon (Grade-IV), vide order dated 23.03.1996 issued by the Project Director, DRDA, Nalbari. While the Petitioner was serving as a Peon, he passed the Bachelor of Preparatory Programme Examination (BPPE) which is equivalent to Higher Secondary or Class-XII Examination. In the year 2016, the Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Assam, Panjabari, Juripar had taken an initiative to promote fifteen (15) incumbents who were similarly situated with that of the Petitioner and promoted them to the posts of Gram Sevaks (RD) (Grade-III), vide office order dated 03.10.2016. However, the Petitioner was left out during the process of promotion.

4. The Petitioner being felt deprived of his legitimate right for being considered for promotion from Grade-IV to Grade-III, immediately submitted two (2) representations before the Commissioner, P&RD on 09.01.2017 & 09.02.2017 respectively, praying for promotion to any Grade-III post. However, his representations were not responded to by P&RD Department. The Petitioner submitted similar representations before the Commissioner, P&RD on several dates subsequently, i.e., on 25.01.2017, 04.02.2017, 09.02.2017, 14.02.2017, 17.02.2017, 23.02.2017 etc. The Petitioner, as such, submitted more than twenty five (25) representations, praying for his promotion from Grade-IV to Grade-III posts. However, his case was never considered by the respondent-Department, i.e., P&RD Department.

5. In the meantime, the Petitioner had also passed his B.A. Examination in the year, 2018 from Krishna Kanta Handique State Open University, Guwahati. After getting his graduation, the Petitioner further submitted two (2) more representations praying for his promotion from Grade-IV to Grade-III posts.

6. It is the case of the Petitioner that as per Rule 6 (6) (b) of Assam Ministerial District Establishment Service Rules 1967, a Grade-IV staff who has passed the Higher Secondary or equivalent examination and st has rendered at least 7 (seven) years of continuous service on the 1 day of the year is eligible for promotion to a Grade-III post. Similarly, as per Rule 10 (3) of the Assam Directorate Establishment (Ministerial) Service Rules 1973, a Grade-IV staff who has passed: (i) Higher Secondary or equivalent examination and has rendered not less than 5 (five) years; or (ii) the Matriculation or equivalent examination and has rendered not less than seven (7) years of st continuous service in the office on the 1 day of the year is eligible for promotion t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top