Back
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Sizoll Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assent Chmicals Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY, J.
1. Heard Mr. N. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. N. Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The present petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for quashment of C.R. Case No. 3182/2010 instituted by the sole respondent under Sections 405/406/415/417 of the IPC pending in trial before the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate-I, Kamrup at Guwahti. The further challenge is an order dated 29.06.2011 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate-I, Kamrup at Guwahati whereby cognizance of offences under Section 406 of IPC was taken.
3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present case are narrated as follows:
(II) The petitioner No. 2 is the Director of Petitioner No. 1 i.e. Sizoll Chemicals Pvt. Ltd who are arrayed as accused No. 1 and 2 in the connected complaint.
(III) According to the complainant, there were business dealings between the parties and in the month of September, 2009, the complain
The court established that a complaint must disclose a criminal offence; mere civil disputes cannot be treated as criminal under Section 406 IPC.
The court established that allegations of non-return of funds in a professional context do not constitute criminal offences under IPC Sections 417, 406, or 506.
The court established that a civil dispute can coexist with criminal allegations, and the mere existence of a civil remedy does not negate the possibility of criminal liability if the complaint discl....
A civil dispute may contain elements of criminal wrongdoing, and the existence of a civil remedy does not bar the initiation of criminal proceedings if the allegations suggest potential criminal offe....
Criminal proceedings should not be used to scuttle legitimate prosecutions and cautioned against criminalizing civil disputes.
The truth or falsity of the allegations in the complaint should not be determined at the earliest stage.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when disputes between the parties constitute only civil wrong and not a criminal wrong, the Courts would not permit a person to be harassed. T....
Non-performance of contractual obligations does not constitute criminal cheating without evidence of fraudulent intent; disputes of civil nature should be resolved through civil remedies.
Criminal proceedings should not be used as an instrument of harassment or for seeking private vendetta.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
