Mohammad Wajid vs State Of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(SC) 690

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 690

B. R. GAVAI, J. B. PARDIWALA
Mohammad Wajid – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohd. Zahid Hussain, AOR Ms. Jemtiben Ao, Adv. Ms. Mumtaz Javed Shaikh, Adv. Ms. Aarushi Singh, Adv. Ms. Vidhi Thaker, Adv. Mr. Prastut Dalvi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Garima Prasad, AAG, Sr. Adv. Mr. Brijendra Chahar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR Mr. Ashish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Prateek Rai, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Shashank Gusain, Adv. Mr. Shubham Saxena, Adv. Mr. Akash, Adv. Mrs. Shweta Yadav, Adv. Mr. Shyam Sundar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prateek Rai, Adv.

Judgement Key Points

Understood. Please provide the legal document content within tags (replacing {content}), and I'll analyze it to generate key points with individual references (e.g., (!) (!) ).

JUDGMENT :

J.B. PARDIWALA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is at the instance of the original accused Nos. 1 and 2 resply of the First Information Report (FIR) being the Crime Registration No. 224 of 2022 dated 19.09.2022 registered with the Mirzapur Police Station, District Saharanpur, State of U.P. for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 504, 506 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and is directed against the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 17.10.2022 in the Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15174 of 2022 by which the High Court rejected the Writ Petition filed by appellants herein thereby declining to quash the aforesaid FIR.

FACTUAL MATRIX

3. The respondent No. 4 herein namely Ram Kumar lodged FIR No. 224 of 2022 for the offences enumerated above at the police station also referred to above. The FIR reads thus:-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 690

B. R. GAVAI, J. B. PARDIWALAMohammad Wajid – AppellantVersusState Of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

B. R. GAVAI, J. B. PARDIWALA
Mohammad Wajid – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent