SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1723

KARDAK ETE
Pani Tapo S/o Late Pani Rui – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Paniye Bate, L. Kagung

JUDGMENT :

KARDAK ETE, J.

1. Heard Mr. P. Bate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. G. Tado, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. By filing this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 jointly, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the criminal proceedings of G.R. Case No. 33/2021, under Sections 468/471/120(B)/420 of the IPC, 1860 on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners.

3. The case, in brief, is that the petitioner No. 1 being the proprietor of M/s Baby Enterprise, who had been initially authorized the petitioners No. 2 and 3 to bid for a tender on his behalf with a condition whoever succeeds to execute the work on behalf of M/s Baby Enterprise in respect of construction of approached road from BRTF road to Tayang under SADA 2018-19 under PWD Sangram Division, Kurung Kumey District for an amount of Rs.96,08,200/-(Rupees Ninety six lakhs eight thousand two hundred). The petitioner No. 3 had asked for sharing of the said construction work from the petitioner No. 2, but the petitioner No. 2 has denied. However, the petitioner No. 3 also started the work on the same stretch of road and after comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top