SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 14

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ANUJ SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to charge-sheet under section 482 cr.p.c. (Para 1)
2. factual background of construction contract and alleged defaults. (Para 2 , 3)
3. arguments asserting the dispute is civil, not criminal. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. state's argument for maintaining criminal charges. (Para 8 , 9)
5. court's framework for examining section 482 cr.p.c. petitions. (Para 10 , 15)
6. criminal intent alleged, not just breach of contract. (Para 16 , 17)
7. existence of forged documents and continuation of criminal proceedings. (Para 18 , 19)
8. assessment that prima facie offences exist; trial deemed appropriate. (Para 20)
9. conclusion that petition under section 482 cr.p.c. is dismissed. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Purohit, J.

1. By means of the present C482 application, applicant has put to challenge the Charge-sheet No.456 of 2018 dated 28.12.2018 for the offence under Section 420 IPC in connection with FIR No. 94 of 2018 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC, registered with P.S. Kotwali Dehradun, District Dehradun, cognizance/summoning order dated 12.02.2019 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, in Case No. 1242 of 2019 State Vs. Anuj Singhal .

2. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top