Back
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Dwipjyoti Baishya, Son Of Late Upendra Nath Baishya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, Represented By The Chief Secretary To The Government Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.)
Heard Mr. N. J. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel for the Forest Department.
2. The petitioner by instituting the present proceeding has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities for appointing him on compassionate grounds in terms of the recommendation made by the State Level Selection Committee, in its meeting held on 13.08.2014. The petitioner had further presented a challenge to a select list published in the News Daily “The Assam Tribune” on 17.07.2015, in terms of a recommendation made by the State Level Committee (SLC), in its meeting held on 01.04.2015.
3. As projected in the writ petition, the father of the petitioner Late Upendra Nath Baishya, while working as a Forest Guard in the establishment of the Divisional Forest Officer, Nalbari, Social Forestry Division, died in harness on 29.01.2004. The petitioner, being eligible under the scheme for compassionate appointment as was then in vogue, submitted his application for appointment on compassionate grounds on 02.02.2004. In the writ petition, the petitioner has contended that after submission of his application, he
Compassionate appointment must be claimed promptly to address immediate financial crises; delay undermines the claim.
Compassionate appointments must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; undue delay can render applications stale and ineligible.
Compassionate appointment claims are contingent on urgency; significant delays may render applications stale and unjustified, nullifying the relief sought.
Compassionate appointment claims must be considered promptly; significant delays can negate the urgency required, making applications stale.
Compassionate appointment claims must be made promptly; significant delay renders them stale as such claims are not vested rights meant to address immediate financial distress.
Compassionate appointments must be sought without undue delay, as prolonged delays can negate the urgency and purpose of such provisions.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial crises; significant delays render claims stale and invalid.
Compassionate appointment is intended for immediate relief in case of death of a breadwinner, and applications must be timely; delays undermine claims for such appointments.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to standard recruitment processes and must be made promptly; delays can render claims stale and unmeritorious.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
