SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 66

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
AKASHDEEP CHETIA S/O LATE GAURI BHUSAN CHETIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: N.I. MAZARBHUYAN, T.K. DEY, L. WAJEEDA, N. ISLAM

JUDGMENT :

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.

1. Heard Mr. S.I. Akand, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel BTC appearing for the respondent nos. 5 to 8.

2. The petitioner in the present proceeding has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities to consider his case for appointment on compassionate grounds against any vacant post available in the department.

3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding is noticed as under:

    The father of the petitioner late Gauri Bhusan Chetia, while working as a Grade-IV employee (Peon) in the establishment of the Executive Engineer, Sivasagar Rural Division, Sivasagar, had died in harness on 19.09.2011. The petitioner, accordingly, submitted an application praying for consideration of his case for appointment on compassionate grounds. The said application of the petitioner was placed before the jurisdictional District Level Committee (DLC) in its meeting held on 12.06.2012. The jurisdictional DLC, on consideration of the case of the petitioner, recommended his case for a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top