SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 70

KARDAK ETE
CHANDRESWAR SAIKIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: N. BORAH, H. MAZUMDER, R. GOGOI, J.I. BORBHUIYA
For the Respondents: R. MAZUMDER, A. CHALIHA

JUDGMENT :

KARDAK ETE, J.

1. Heard Mr. N. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP (C) 9573/2019 & WP (C) 3288/2016 and Mr. J.I. Borbhuiyan, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP (C) 3329/2016 & WP (C) 1772/2017. Also heard Mr. R. Mazumder, learned standing counsel, Elementary Education Department and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing counsel, Finance Department.

2. By filing these petitions, the petitioners have put to challenge the show-cause notice No. 4981-5730 dated 30.03.1992 and impugned termination order vide Memo No. 7040-43 dated 18.05.1992 issued by the Deputy Inspector of School, Dhemaji, by which the service of the petitioners have been terminated.

3. Having considered that these writ petitions are analogous on facts and law, the same were heard and are disposed of by this common judgment and order.

4. In WP (C) 9573/2019, the writ petitioners, 14 in numbers, having requisite qualification for appointment to the posts of Assistant Teacher of L.P. Schools, applied for the said posts pursuant to the advertisement issued by the respondent authorities. It is contended that after due selection process and on being selected, they were appointed by the Deputy Inspector

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top