SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Manish Choudhury, J.
Rublieas Hussain, S/o. Lt. Zakir Hussain – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, Home Department and ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/6157/2023
Decided On : 07-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Z Hammad
For the Respondent: GA, Assam

The withdrawal of the compassionate appointment scheme prior to the employee's death means the petitioner is only entitled to benefits under the Compassionate Family Pension Scheme.

Headnote:(A) Compassionate Appointment Scheme - Notification No. FEG.28/2017/26 dated 14.09.2017 - The petitioner sought appointment on compassionate grounds after the death of his father, who died in harness on 25.07.2020. The scheme for compassionate appointment was withdrawn effective 01.04.2017, replaced by the Compassionate Family Pension Scheme applicable to employees who died on or after that date. (Paras 5, 6, 8)

(B) The court found that the petitioner was not entitled to appointment on compassionate grounds as the applicable scheme only provided for family pension, which was the only benefit available to the family of the deceased employee. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for compassionate appointment after the death of his father, who was a government employee. The application was not processed due to the withdrawal of the compassionate appointment scheme.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the petitioner was entitled only to the benefits under the Compassionate Family Pension Scheme, not to a compassionate appointment.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to compassionate appointment despite the withdrawal of the scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the withdrawal of the compassionate appointment scheme and the introduction of the family pension scheme meant that the petitioner could not claim appointment on compassionate grounds.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Manish Choudhury, J.

Heard Mr. Z. Hammad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J.K. Goswami, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for all the respondents.

2. The case projected in this writ petition by the petitioner, in brief, is that the father of the petitioner viz. Late Zakir Hussain was working as a UBC/333 in the D.E.F., Nagaon under the respondent no. 3. The petitioner’s father, Zakir Hussain died in harness on 25.07.2020 leaving behind his wife and other family members including the petitioner. In support of the said fact, the petitioner has annexed a copy of the death certificate issued on 17.08.2020 by the Registrar, Birth & Death, Tarabari MPHC, Nagaon, Assam as Annexure-2 to the writ petition.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he passed the High School Leaving Certificate [HSLC] Examination in the year 2017 and his date of birth is 08.01.2001. The petitioner stated to have studied up to Higher Secondary level and he passed the Higher Secondary Final Examination held under the aegis of the Assam Higher Secondary Education Council in 2nd Division in the year 2019 and has annexed a copy of the pass certificate issued by the AHSEC on 25.05.2019. After the death of his father, the petitioner stated to have made an application before the respondent no. 3 seeking his appointment on compassionate ground along with all the requisite testimonials.

4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner despite submission of his application for appointment on compassionate ground, the respondent authorities, more particularly, the District Level Committee [DLC] did not intimate the fate of his application for appointment on compassionate ground.

5. Mr. Goswami, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam has submitted that the scheme for appointment on compassionate ground has since been withdrawn and accordingly all the office memorandums issued in connection had also been withdrawn. He has placed a copy of the extant scheme, scheme for Compassionate Family Pension in lieu of Compassionate appointment, notified by a Notification bearing no. FEG.28/2017/26 dated 14.09.2017 issued by the Finance Department, Government of Assam. Mr. Goswami by drawing support from the Notification dated 14.09.2017, has submitted that on and from 01.04.2017, no application on compassionate ground has been made as the scheme for compassionate appointment has already been withdrawn. Instead, it is the Compassionate Family Pension, which is payable to the family of a State Government employee who died in harness.

6. On perusal of the Notification dated 14.09.2017 [supra], it is noticed that by the said Notification, the said Notification has notified a scheme named ‘Scheme for Compassionate Family Pension in lieu of Compassionate Appointment’ [‘the CFP Scheme’, for short]. As per Clause 5.11 thereof, the CFP Scheme has been made applicable to those employees who died/die in harness on or after 01.04.2017.

7. As per the CFP Scheme, when an employee dies before superannuation, the family pension equal to 100% of the last pay drawn by the deceased employee be paid for a period up to the date of ‘deemed superannuation’ of the deceased employee, i.e. the date on which the employee would have superannuated had he been alive. The CFP Scheme has been brought on the terms that such a situation would compensate the loss of family income to a large extent and fulfill the requirement of compassionate conditions arising out of the death of the serving employee.

8. In view of non-existence of the scheme of appointment on compassionate ground on and from 01.04.2017 and enforcement of the Scheme for Compassionate Family Pension on and from 01.04.2017 granting family pension equal to 100% of the last pay drawn by the deceased employee to be paid for a period up to the date of deemed superannuation of the deceased employee, this petitioner, preferred by the petitioner seeking appointment on compassionate ground, is found unm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top