SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1788

ROBIN PHUKAN
Urmila Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Dr. N. Deka, Mr. A. Paul
For the Respondent: Mr. B. Sharma, Mr. A. Paul, Mr. B. Sharma, Dr. N. Deka

JUDGMENT :

Robin Phukan, J.

By this common judgment it is proposed to hear and dispose of Criminal Revision Petition No. 532/2022 and Criminal Revision petition No. 610/2022, as legality, propriety and correctness of the same judgment and order, dated 26.09.2022, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Darrang, Mangaldai, in Criminal Appeal No.07/2021, is being questioned in both the petitions and as the parties involved in both the petitions are also identical and as identical questions of law are involved in both the petitions.

2. In Criminal Revision Petition No. 532/2022, under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner, namely, Smti. Urmila Das, has challenged the correctness or otherwise of the judgment and order dated 26.09.2022, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Darrang, Mangaldoi, in Criminal Appeal No.07/2021, preferred under sections 11/11(2) of the Probation of the Offenders Act. It is to be mentioned here that vide impugned judgment and order dated 26.09.2022, learned Sessions Judge, Darrang had interfered with judgment and order dated 04.03.2021, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Darrang, Mangaldai in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top