SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 420

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
NAND PRABHA SHUKLA
Babu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ram Raj Mishra, G.S. Chaturvedi.
For the Respondent: Dga.

JUDGMENT :

NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. This appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.09.1988 passed by X Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly in S.T. No. 185 of 1986 convicting the appellant Baburam under Section 324 IPC and sentencing him one year R.I. and co-appellant Mallah convicted one year R.I. under /34 and also fine of Rs. 1000/- each and in default of payment of fine three months R.I.

3. Today, the present Criminal Appeal is listed under the category of oldest pending cases in this High Court for priority basis.

4. As per the office report dated 16.02.2026, appellant No. 1 Babu Ram has been released on bail after furnishing bonds and undertakings and appellant No. 2 Mallah has died 20 years ago and the appeal against appellant no. 2 stood abated on 25/11/2025.

5. From the perusal of records, it transpires that the appellant No. 1 Babu Ram has been convicted for the offence under Section 324 IPC to undergo one year R.I. and also fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine three months R.I.

6. In the case of Subhash Chand & othe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top