MANISH CHOUDHURY
Jayacharan Barman – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manish Choudhury, J.
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred seeking inter alia a direction to the respondent Insurance Company to satisfy the claim in respect of an insurance policy which the petitioner as the insured had taken in respect of a vehicle. The petitioner has approached this Court after the Insurance Ombudsman, Guwahati Centre had rejected a complaint preferred by the petitioner as the complainant before it, by an Order dated 03.09.2013.
2. The relevant events which have led the petitioner to prefer the writ petition can be narrated, in brief, as follows :-
Ratul Das vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and others
Life Insurance Corporation of India and others vs. Asha Goel [Smt] and another
Sadhana Lodh vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. and another
Mohammed Hanif vs. the State of Assam
Banchhanidhi Rath vs. the State of Orissa and others
Smt. Rukmanibai Gupta vs. Collector, Jabalpur and others
The court ruled that an insurance claim cannot be repudiated on misinterpretations of theft and abandonment, emphasizing the need for valid grounds for repudiation.
An Insurance Ombudsman must not rely on inadmissible evidence; doing so undermines the principle of fair adjudication required in quasi-judicial proceedings.
Writ petitions related to insurance claims involving factual disputes are not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution, mandating civil adjudication instead.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the State to act fairly in insurance contracts, the violation of which can lead to the setting aside of repudiated insurance claims.
An insurance policy lapses if the premium is not paid within the grace period; revivals after the insured's death are impermissible under contract terms.
The court held that disputes regarding insurance claims involving factual determinations are not suitable for resolution under Article 226, necessitating civil proceedings or arbitration.
A lapsed insurance policy cannot be revived post-death, and the Insurance Ombudsman lacks authority to bypass contract terms based on equity.
Point of Law : Section 39 mandates that no person shall drive any motor vehicle and no owner of a motor vehicle shall cause or permit vehicle to be driven in any public place or in any other place un....
The court emphasized the need for proper justification and adherence to regulations in repudiating an insurance claim, and highlighted the importance of considering expert reports and providing reaso....
Motor Insurance Policy – Any violation of condition should be in nature of a fundamental breach so as to deny claimant any amount.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.