Back
KALYAN RAI SURANA
Poonam Mahanta Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Kalyan Sarma – Respondent
ORDER :
Kalyan Rai Surana, J.
1. Heard Mr. A. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Roychoudhury, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. By this application filed under section 115 read with section 151 CPC and Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 09.06.2023, 06.07.2023 and 20.06.2023, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court-I, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in F.C.(G) Case No. 101/2018.
3. It may be mentioned that the learned counsel for the respondent had that an affidavit-in- opposition had been filed. However, the same is not tagged with the record. Nonetheless, the learned counsel for the respondent had submitted that the reference to the stand taken in the affidavit- in-opposition has been referred to in the affidavit-in-reply filed by the petitioner, which is available in the record and he has expressed that the matter be heard on whatever material is available on record. Accordingly, with the consent of the learned counsel for both the parties, the matter has been heard.
4. At the outset it may be mentioned that in this order, the names of the parties and their minor son is not disclosed. Similarly, the name of
A party cannot introduce evidence on matters not pleaded, and the High Court will not interfere unless there is grave dereliction of duty or flagrant abuse of power.
Jurisdiction for custody of a minor must be determined by the child's ordinary residence, as per Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.
The Family Court's decision prioritizes the child's welfare over a father's custody rights due to serious criminal charges against him, validating the placement of the child with maternal grandparent....
Judicial officers should not be impleaded in writ petitions, and applications under Order XI must be timely and relevant to the case.
Amendments to pleadings should be allowed for effective adjudication unless they introduce time-barred claims or change the nature of the suit, with courts required to consider prior admissions and l....
The paramount consideration of the welfare and interests of the child in custody matters, the importance of following prescribed procedures for recording settlements and issuing decrees, and the avai....
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title and are subject to civil suits for declaration of rights.
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title and are subject to the outcome of civil suits regarding property rights.
The discretion of the trial court to set aside an ex parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is essential to ensure a fair trial, particularly when the opposing party has not been given a reasonable ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
