Back
DEVASHIS BARUAH
PCI Cables Industries Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assam Power Distribution Company Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Heard Mr. H. Gupta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Pathak appears on behalf of the respondent.
2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 17.01.2025 passed by the learned Court of Additional District Judge No. 1, Kamrup (M), Guwahati (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Appellate Court) in Misc. Arbitration Appeal No. 01/2025 whereby the ad interim ex-parte order dated 03.01.2025 passed in Misc (Arbitration) No. 01/2025 by the learned Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.3, Kamrup (Metro) at Guwahati was set aside and quashed.
3. The question which arises in the instant proceedings is as to whether this Court should exercise its supervisory jurisdiction against an order passed by the learned Appellate Court who had exercised jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, “the Act of 1996”). To ascertain the said, this Court would like to briefly deal with the facts leading to the filing of the instant proceedings.
4. The petitioner herein was awar
The Appellate Court has jurisdiction to set aside ex-parte orders under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, especially when the contract in question is deemed determinable.
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable if the conditions for appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are not met, emphasizing the need to adhere....
Bank Guarantee – Courts should be reluctant in granting injunction against invocation of Bank Guarantee, except in cases of established fraud, or where irretrievable injury is likely to be caused to ....
The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the statutory provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, particularly regarding the filing of Section 34 applications during the pendency o....
Doctrine of precedent is limited to the decision itself and as to what is necessarily involved in it. It does not mean, it was held, that the court was bound by the various reasons given in support o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the arbitrator's duty to inform the claimant of their failure to communicate their claim and to provide an opportunity to show sufficient cause, an....
Grant of injunction – Wherever proceedings are under CPC and forum is Civil Court, availability of a remedy under CPC, will deter High Court from exercising its Power of Superintendence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that once an application is filed under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the civil court has no jurisdiction to continue with the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
