SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 272

THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
VIJAY BISHNOI, CJ, N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J
Dilip Bahadur Dhamai S/o- Lt. Bishnu Bahadur Dhamai - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And 4 Ors. - Respondent
WA 224 / 2023
Decided On : 11-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: MR. H A TALUKDAR, MR. K MIRA
For the Respondent: SC, HIGHER EDU

IMPORTANT POINT
Promotion eligibility must adhere to prescribed qualifications as per established guidelines, including seniority considerations.

Headnote:

(A) Assam College Employees (Provincialization) Rules, 2010 - Rule 5 - Promotion eligibility - The appellant, a Laboratory Bearer, challenged the rejection of his promotion to Junior Assistant due to lack of prescribed qualifications per the Notification dated 09.02.2017. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, affirming that the guidelines apply to promotions. (Paras 3 , 4 , 9 )

(B) Promotion Criteria - The court emphasized that the eligibility criteria for promotions must be adhered to as per the established rules, and seniority must be considered in promotion decisions. (Paras 8 , 10 )

Facts of the case:

The appellant sought promotion to Junior Assistant after a recommendation from the Departmental Promotion Committee, which was rejected by the Director for lack of qualifications. The appellant argued that the guidelines were not applicable to promotions. (Paras 2 , 3 )

Findings of Court:

The learned Single Judge's dismissal of the writ petition was upheld, as no evidence was provided to dispute the qualifications required for promotion. (Paras 10 )

Issues: The key issues were whether the guidelines for educational qualifications apply to promotions and the consideration of seniority in promotion decisions. (Paras 4 , 8 )

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the guidelines for educational qualifications apply to promotions, and the appellant's promotion was denied due to the absence of necessary qualifications and the presence of senior candidates. (Paras 9 , 10 )

Result: Writ appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.

Heard Mr. K. Mir, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. Also heard Mr. D. Upamanyu, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department, appearing on behalf of all the respondents.

2. The appellant, herein, by way of instituting the intra-Court appeal, has presented a challenge to an order, dated 25.01.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(c)311/2023.

3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding, is noticed as under:

The appellant, herein, who was working a Laboratory Bearer in Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, had initially approached the writ Court by way of instituting a writ petition being WP(c)2621/2017, praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities for consideration of his case for promotion to the cadre of Junior Assistant. The writ Court vide order, dated 24.01.2020, was pleased to dispose of the said writ petition, directing the authorities of Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, to consider the case of the appellant, herein, along with other eligible candidates, for promotion against the vacant post of Junior Assistant if the aforesaid post falls under promotional quota as per Rule. Thereafter, it is seen that the authorities of Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, had conducted a selection in the matter and the Departmental Promotion Committee(DPC) so constituted, had, in its meeting held on 20.02.2021, proceeded to recommend the case of the appellant, herein, for promotion against a post of Junior Assistant lying vacant in the said College.

The said recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee(DPC) of the Srikishan Sarda College, Hailakandi, was approved by the Governing Body of the said College, in its meeting held on 18.03.2021, and accordingly, the matter was forwarded to the Director, Higher Education Department, Assam, for approval. The Director, Higher Education Department, Assam, upon consideration of the matter, vide communication, dated 15.12.2022, proceeded to reject the proposal so submitted by the College authorities for promotion of the appellant to the post of Junior Assistant on the ground that he did not possess the prescribed qualification for being considered for such promotion.

Being aggrieved, the appellant, herein, had approached the writ Court by way of instituting a writ petition being WP(c)311/2023. The learned Single Judge after considering the issue arising in the proceeding, was pleased vide order, dated 25.01.2023, to dismiss the said writ petition holding that the appellant not possessing the educational qualification as prescribed for being considered for promotion to the post of Group C in terms of the Guidelines as notified vide the Notification, dated 09.02.2017; the order, dated 15.12.2022, passed by the Director, Higher Education Department, Assam, would not call for any interference.

4. Mr. Mir, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that the prescription of eligibility criteria in the Guidelines as notified vide the Notification, dated 09.02.2017, for the post of Junior Assistant in a provincialized College of the State, would not be mandated to be so applied in case of promotion to the post of Junior Assistant, in-as-much as, the said Guidelines as notified vide the Notification, dated 09.02.2017, would only be applicable in respect of direct recruitment to the post, in question.

5. Mr. Mir, learned counsel, has further submitted that the Assam College Employees(Provincialization) Rules, 2010, does not mandate any eligibility criteria requisite to be possessed for being considered for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant from the cadre of Laboratory Bearer/Library Bearer/ Grade-IV.

6. Mr. Mir, learned counsel for the appellant, has, however, not been able to highlight as to the eligibility criteria requisite to be mandated, to be poss


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top