IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
SYED SHAH SIKANDAR ALI S/O LATE SULEMAN ALI – Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
WP (C) No. 6576 of 2022
Decided On : 06-09-2024
Promotion - Junior Assistant - Assam Secondary Education (Govt. Schools) Service Rules, 2020; Assam Directorate Estt. (Ministerial) Service Rules, 1973 - The court interpreted the provisions of the Service Rules of 2020, concluding that there is no provision for promotion from Grade-IV to Junior Assistant, thus denying the petitioner's claim for promotion.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought promotion to Junior Assistant, claiming eligibility under the Service Rules of 1973, despite the Service Rules of 2020 stating no provision for such promotion. The petitioner challenged a communication denying his promotion based on these rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Service Rules of 2020 do not allow for promotion from Grade-IV to Junior Assistant, and the speaking order issued by the Director of Secondary Education was without jurisdiction, thus not applicable.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to promotion to Junior Assistant under the existing service rules, particularly in light of the Service Rules of 2020.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the right to be considered for promotion is governed by the rules in force at the time of consideration, and since the Service Rules of 2020 do not provide for promotion from Grade-IV, the petitioner cannot be promoted.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
1. Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Kaushik, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Secondary Education, Assam, representing the respondents no. 1 to 4 and Mr. K.R. Patgiri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 5.
2. The petitioner, by way of instituting the present proceeding has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities for consideration of his case for promotion against the post of Junior Assistant, lying vacant in Cotton Collegiate Govt. Higher Secondary School, Panbazar, Guwahati; or, in any other vacant post of Junior Assistant. The petitioner has also presented a challenge to a communication dated 27.05.2022, issued by the Director of Secondary Education, Assam, holding therein, that there being no provision for promotion of Grade-IV employees to the post of Junior Assistant, under the provisions of Assam Secondary Education (Govt. Schools) Service Rules, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as “the Service Rules of 2020”).
3. The petitioner, who is a graduate, was initially engaged as a Bungalow Peon, to the then Director of Secondary Education, Assam, in the year 2004. Subsequently, the petitioner, in terms of a Government policy, in vogue was absorbed as a Grade-IV employee vide the order dated 31.12.2011; in the office of the Principal of Cotton Collegiate Govt. Higher Secondary School, Guwahati (hereinafter referred to as “the school”). It is contended that the Director of Secondary Education, Assam, vide a communication dated 29.11.2017; had intimated that the Ministerial Staff of Govt. Secondary Schools as well as that of the Inspector of Schools of Assam, is to be treated as a common cadre and the Directorate was following the Assam Directorate Esstt. (Ministerial) Service Rules, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as “the Service Rules of 1973”) for considering the cases of such Ministerial Staffs to the next higher grade.
4. The petitioner, further contends that the provisions of the said Service Rules of 1973, had undergone an amendment in the year 2016 and in terms of the said amendment, a Grade-IV employee was eligible for consideration for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant, provided that, he had a Bachelor degree from a university recognized by the Government and had rendered not less than 07(seven) years of continuous service. It further provides that the 10% of the vacancies in the cadre of Junior Assistant is to be filled up by way of promotion from amongst eligible Grade-IV employees. The petitioner, herein, being a graduate and on completion of the requisite length of service as a Grade-IV employee, submitted an application, before the Director of Secondary Education, Assam, on 28.01.2019; praying for consideration of his case for promotion against the vacant post of Junior Assistant, available in the school wherein he is working, on account of the incumbent therein, retiring on 20.10.2011.
5. The petitioner, thereafter, had again approached the Director of Secondary Education, Assam, praying for consideration of his case for promotion. One of such representations made, was forwarded by the Principal of the school, vide a forwarding dated 08.04.2022. The said representation as preferred by the petitioner in the year 2022 and forwarded by the Principal of the said school, on 08.04.2022; on consideration, came to be responded to, by the Director of Secondary Education, Assam, vide a communication dated 27.05.2022; wherein, it was held that there is no provision for promotion of Grade-IV employee to the post of Junior Assistant in the said Service Rules of 2020.
6. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said communication dated 27.05.2022, has instituted the present proceeding, assailing the same with a further prayer for a direction upon the respondent authorities to consider his case for promotion against the post of Junior Assistant, lying vacant in the said school since 2011 and/or any other vacant
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. Vs. Raj Kumar and Ors. 2023 (3) SCC 773
Y.V. Rangaiah and Ors. Vs. J. Sreenivasa Rao & Ors. (1983) 3 SCC 284
The court established that the right to promotion is determined by the rules in force at the time of consideration, and the Service Rules of 2020 do not permit promotion from Grade-IV to Junior Assis....
Promotion rules of a public service entity do not require graduation for advancement when the governing rules do not explicitly mandate such qualifications, emphasizing merit and seniority.
Promotion from Record Assistant to Junior Assistant, though irregular, was not illegal as it was made after completing the necessary service and there was a sanctioned post available. The period of c....
Promotion eligibility governed by current administrative rules; previous qualifications irrelevant after absorption into new regulations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cut-off date for promotion eligibility, as prescribed under Rule 11 (C) of the Assam Treasury (Establishment) Service Rules 1993, applies ....
when a new post is created, the concept of Rules obtaining when the vacancies arose is inappiicable as what is created is a new post on account of re-structuring of the cadre.
The court established that promotions must adhere to seniority rules based on continuous service, invalidating promotions conducted without a proper inter-se seniority list.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.