N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Chiranjeev Neog S/o Lt. Atul Ch. Neog – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Heard Ms. Maramee Dutta Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Dilip Mazumdar, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam, assisted by Mr. R. Dhar, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate;appearing on behalf of all the respondents.
2. The petitioner, herein, by way of instituting the present proceeding, has presented a challenge to the decision arrived at by the jurisdictional District Level Committee in its meeting held on 01.02.2022, towards rejecting the application of the petitioner for consideration of his case for appointment on compassionate ground.
3. As projected in the writ petition, the father of the petitioner Late Atul Ch. Neog, while working as a Forest Ranger in the establishment of the respondent No. 3, herein, had died-in-harness on 02.11.2010. The mother of the petitioner in pursuance of the death of her husband in harness, submitted an application on 25.02.2010, before the respondent No. 3, praying for appointment of her daughter Ms. Sikha Neog, on compassionate ground. It is contended that although the said application of the mother of the petitioner, seeking appoin
Compassionate appointments must be applied for within one year of the employee's death; delays undermine the claim's validity and significance.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial crises; significant delays render applications stale and unconsiderable.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial distress; significant delays render claims stale and ineligible for consideration.
Compassionate appointments must be sought promptly; significant delays negate claims as the urgency diminishes.
Compassionate appointments are time-sensitive and must be made without undue delay to address financial distress; stale claims will not be entertained as needs may change over time.
Compassionate appointment claims must be filed promptly; delays undermine the grounds for consideration, rendering such cases stale.
Compassionate appointments are not a vested right and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as the urgency for such appointments diminishes over time.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial crises, and undue delays can render claims stale and unentitled.
Compassionate appointments must be timely; claims made after significant delays cannot be justified, as financial need may no longer exist.
Compassionate appointments are exceptional provisions that cannot be claimed after a significant delay, as the immediacy of need must be preserved.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.