SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 303

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
ROBIN PHUKAN, J
On The Death Of Ram Niranjan Bawri His Legal Heirs And Rep. Ajai Bawari And Ors - Appellant
Versus
Dr. Monohar Bawri S/o Late Nandlal Bawari And Ors - Respondent
RFA 36/2017
Decided On : 19-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. B.D. Deka
For the Respondents: Mr. S.S. Sarangi, Sr. Adv., Mr. D. Rathi

IMPORTANT POINT
The court affirmed that the execution of a Will must comply with statutory requirements, and the burden of proof lies on those alleging its invalidity.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 276 - Probate of Will - The learned District Judge granted probate of the Will executed by Suti Devi Bawari on 10.02.1987, despite objections regarding its validity and execution - The court found that the Will was executed in a sound state of mind and was duly attested by witnesses - The appellants challenged the probate on grounds of limitation, suspicious circumstances, and the testatrix's right to bequeath property - The court held that the execution of the Will was established and the objections were unsubstantiated. (Paras 2 , 3 , 22 , 23 , 29 )

(B) Legal Principles - The court reiterated that the burden of proof lies on the party alleging fraud or fabrication regarding the Will - The requirements for proving a Will under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act must be strictly adhered to, including proper execution and attestation. (Paras 11 , 16 , 23 )

Facts of the case:

The respondent filed for probate of his mother's Will, executed in 1987, after her death in 1988. The appellants contested the Will's validity, claiming it was fabricated and that the testatrix lacked the right to bequeath the property.

Findings of Court:

The court found that the Will was executed properly, with witnesses confirming its validity, and that the testatrix was of sound mind.

Issues: The main issues included whether the Will was executed validly, whether the testatrix had the right to dispose of the property, and whether the execution was proven.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Will was validly executed and that the objections raised by the appellants did not meet the burden of proof required to invalidate the Will.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

ROBIN PHUKAN, J.

Heard Mr. B.D. Deka, learned counsel for the appellants and also heard Mr. S.S. Sarangi, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. D. Rathi, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. In this regular first appeal, the appellants have challenged the correctness or otherwise of the judgment and order dated 13.03.2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Tinsukia, in Misc. (Probate) Case No.87/2001. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and order dated 13.03.2009, the learned District Judge, Tinsukia, (Trial Court for short), had granted probate of the Will, dated 10.02.1987, executed by Suti Devi Bawari, W/o Late Nandlal Bawari.

3. The back ground facts leading to filing of the present appeal is briefly stated as under:-

    “The respondent No.1 herein Dr. Monohar Bawari has filed a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for issuance of probate of the Will of late Suti Devi Bawari, who suffered demise on 11.12.1988. His case is that his mother late Suti Devi Bawari was a permanent residence of Parbotia, Tinsukia Town and she expired on 11.12.1988, at her residence at Parbotia. She left behind the respondent/petitioner Dr. Monohar Bawari and the opposite parties, namely, Mahabir Prasad Bawari, Banawarilal Bawari, Ram Niranjan Bawari, Rajkumari Khetawat and Rajani Singhania, who are her near relatives. Before her death, late Suti Devi Bawari has executed her last Will and testament in presence of witnesses on 10.02.1987. By virtue of the said Will, the testatrix had appointed the respondent No.1/petitioner as the executor of the Will. The value of the bequeathed estate by the said Will is estimated at Rs.3,00,000/- and the amount of liabilities and lawful deductions of the said testatrix was Rs.35,000/- as described in the Schedule of the petition. The petitioner had earlier filed one probate case, being Probate Case No.11/1998 and Misc. Probate Case No.34/2001 for grant of probate, but the same were dismissed for default. The Will was executed by the testatrix in her residence at Parbotia and at that time she was in good health and mind and therefore, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of the probate of the Will executed by his mother late Suti Devi Bawari before the learned District Judge, Tinsukia, by filing a petition being Misc. (Probate) Case No. 87/2001.

    The appellants herein had filed written objection in the aforementioned petition. Ram Niranjan Bawari, opposite party (O.P.) No.3 had filed written statement, wherein he had taken a stand that the petition is not maintainable in law and facts and the petitioner has no right to file the present probate case, as the Will so executed, apart from being false, fabricated and concocted, is not tenable in the eye of law. However, he admitted the death of testatrix on 11.12.1988 and also admitted that at the time of her death, she was staying at Tinsukia at the residence cum Nursing Home of the petitioner, where she came for her treatment and the O.P. No.3 had also admitted the contents of paragraph Nos.2 and 6, of the petition, however, he denied execution of the Will by late Suti Devi Bawari on 11.02.1987, being her last Will and he denied the validity and legality of the Will and also denied appointment of the petitioner as executor of the same and also denied the value of the property and the expenses incurred by the petitioner towards the funeral and Shradha ceremony and that the value of the subject matter of the Will, would be more than Rs.16,00,000/- and that the subject matter of the Will came to the share of Nandlal Bawari out of Hindu Undivided Family, namely, M/s Chunnilal Netram and said Nandlal Bawari died on 13.01.1970 leaving behind Suti Devi Bawari, Mahabir Prasad Bawari, Ram Niranjan Bawari, Banwarilal Bawari, Dr. Monohar Bawari, Rajkumari Bawari and Rajani Bawari and that the dispute arose between the heirs of said Nandlal Bawari relating to




















































          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top