SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 424

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Pradip Kumar Dutta D/o Late Debananda Dutta - Appellant 
VERSUS
The State Of Assam - Respondent 
WP(C)/1466/2025
Decided On : 05-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. P K GOGOI, MR J P KACHARI
For the Respondent: SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM

The rejection of an application for public service must be a speaking order, and failure to provide reasons violates principles of natural justice, rendering the order arbitrary.

Headnote:(A) Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012 - Sections 2[h], 5, 7[1], 7[2], and 8 - Writ petition under Article 226 - Rejection of application for conversion of land from Annual Patta to Periodic Patta - The rejection order was found to be non-speaking and arbitrary, violating principles of natural justice - The Designated Public Servant failed to record reasons for rejection, making the order liable to be set aside. (Paras 4, 19, 26, 27)

(B) Principles of Natural Justice - The obligation to record reasons in a decision is essential to ensure fairness and transparency, particularly when the decision adversely affects a citizen's rights. (Paras 19, 23)

(C) Alternative Remedy - A writ petition may be maintainable despite the existence of an alternative remedy if it involves enforcement of fundamental rights or violation of natural justice. (Paras 21, 24)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought conversion of land from Annual Patta to Periodic Patta under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, but the application was rejected by the Circle Officer citing disputed possession without providing reasons.

Findings of Court:
The rejection order was set aside due to its non-compliance with statutory requirements of recording reasons and violation of natural justice principles.

Issues: Whether the rejection order was valid given the lack of reasons provided and the alleged violation of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of a speaking order and adherence to statutory obligations, ruling that the absence of reasons rendered the rejection arbitrary and unjust.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.

Heard Mr. P.K. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent nos. 1 & 2; and Ms. S. Sarma, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 3, 4 & 5.

2. In this writ petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has projected that the petitioner has come into possession of a plot of land measuring 1 Bigha 2 Kathas 10 Lessas, covered by Dag no. 325 & Annual [Eksonia] Patta no. 76, situate at Village - Borpatra Dole Kalu Gaon, Mouza – Hologuri, District - Sivasagar ['the subject-plot no. 1', for short], after executing a notarized Agreement dated 10.03.2023 with the erstwhile possessor of the subject-plot no. 1. The petitioner has stated that he came into possession of another plot of land measuring 2 Bighas 2 Kathas 10 Lessas, covered by Dag no. 325 & Annual [Eksonia] Patta no. 76, situate at the same village ['the subject-plot no. 2', for short] after execution of a notarized Agreement dated 10.03.2023 with the previous possessor of the subject-plot no. 2. The petitioner has stated that both subject-plots are adjacent to each other and are under the same Dag no. 325 & Annual [Eksonia] Patta no. 76. After coming into possession of the said two subject-plots measuring 4 Bighas in total, the petitioner continued to be in occupation of the two subject-plots.

3. When the State Government launched a scheme named ‘Mission Basundhara Scheme’ in order to streamline and resolve land related issues and for updation of land records, the petitioner submitted an application online under the scheme, ‘Basundhara 2.0’ on 29.03.2023 to avail the notified service, ‘Conversion of land from Annual Patta [A.P.] to Periodic Patta [P.P.]’. The petitioner has further stated that he submitted the application online for conversion of 3 Bighas of Annual Patta land to Periodic Patta land, out of the two subject- plots. The receipt of the said application was duly acknowledged in the Sewa Setu portal vide Application Reference no. RTPS/SAPH/2023/1509236 on 29.03.2023. While issuing acknowledgement, it was further mentioned that if the application would be accepted by the Revenue & Disaster Management Department then the notified service would be provided within 300 days. It was further mentioned that if the service was not delivered within 300 days, the petitioner could prefer an appeal. The application submitted by the petitioner to avail notified service came to be rejected on 26.10.2023.

4. When the petitioner tried to obtain the status of his application in the comprehensive citizen platform, Sewa Setu, he came to learn that the application submitted by the petitioner was rejected by the respondent no. 5 on 26.10.2023 and Sewa Setu showed the application’s processing history as under :-

Application tracking details
Reference no. : RTPS/SAPH/2023/1509236Submitted on : 2023-03-09 00:00:00
Applicant NamePradip Kumar DuttaService NameSettlement of AP transferred land from original AP holder
Stipulated Delivery DateBy 14th November, 2023Current StatusREJECTED
Application processing history
Date & TimeTask detailsRemarks
2023-08-23 15:50:06FORWARD, CONotice Generated
2023-08-23 15:50:07FORWARD, COForwarded to LM
2023-10-09 22:35:41FORWARD, LM Forwarded to CO
2023-10-26 19:00:04REJECT, CORejected by CO : Possession of land is disputed

5. Mr. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the service, ‘Conversion of land from Annual Patta [A.P.] to Periodic Patta [P.P.]’ has been declared to be a notified public service under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012 [‘the ARTPS Act’, for short] vide a Notification bearing no. RRG.77/2021/46 dated 14.03.2022. As per the said Notification, the Designated Public Servant [DPS] is the Circle Officer in rural areas for plots of lands like the subject-plots. As per the said Notification and the Citizen Charter annexed there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top