SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3341

M. DHANDAPANI
V. Kamalakannan – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar Thirukazhukundram, Kancheepuram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Ramesh, SC, M. Sneha, Advocate. For the Respondents: R.P. Murugan Raja, GA.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: W.P. No.20949 of 2014 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for all the records relating to the impugned order Na.Ka.2610/2012/Aa1 dated 29.10.2013 passed by the 1st respondent herein and quash the same insofar as it relates to the lands of the petitioner covered under patta Nos.921, 1412 and 1418 of Poonthandalam and Neikuppi Villages, Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to restore all the Taluk and Village revenue records pertaining to the lands of the petitioner covered under patta Nos.921, 1412 and 1418 of Poonthandalam and Neikuppi Villages, Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Kancheepuram District as they were on 28.10.2013, i.e., immediately prior to the passing of the above said impugned order.

W.P. No.29241 of 2014 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned communication D.O. Lr.No.Rc.K1/36249/06 dated 14.02.2011 issued by the Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Land Administration, Chennai, the first respondent he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top