Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Pankaj Dutta S/o Shri Atul Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Shrimanta Sankardev Sangha (Mul) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Ditul Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. J Roy, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S Sarma appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 6.
2. The petitioner herein has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 10.10.2023 passed in Misc. Appeal No.4/2021 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the order dated 08.12.2021 passed in Misc.(J).Case No.212/2021 by the learned Munsiff No.3, Kamrup(M) Guwahati was upheld.
3. The question which arises in the instant proceedings is as to whether this Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction should entertain the instant proceedings.
4. The materials on record reveals that the petitioner herein as plaintiff claims to be a member of the respondent No.1 who was elected as the General Secretary of the 24th No. Kendriya Sishu, Juva and Al Matri Samaroh. It is the case of the plaintiff/petitioner that the petitioner on successfully concluding the Samaroh filed the audit report of the Samaroh to the respondent No.1 herein as per Article 18 of the Constitution of the respondent No.1, detaili
The court affirmed limited jurisdiction in internal society matters, emphasizing that injunctions require a clear balance of convenience and irreparable harm, which were not established.
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 does not allow interference unless there is a manifest error or flagrant abuse of justice by the Administrative Tribunal.
The main legal point established in the given judgment is the conflict between the orders of the District Munsif and the I Additional District Judge in OS No.509 of 2019, and the requirement of permi....
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is not appellate; it is restricted to correcting manifest errors or perversity and cannot be invoked to reassess factual findings of a subo....
A person who is not a party and who has not been served with such notice (notice of the judgment or order) cannot appeal without leave, but a person who might properly have been a party may obtain le....
The court highlighted the principles governing amendments of pleadings and the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction as key legal principles established in the judgment.
An inspection order under the Telangana Cooperative Societies Act must be founded on justifiable grounds within the order itself, not influenced by external parties.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
