SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 613

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH 
Manish Choudhury, J.
Habibar Rahman, S/o- Late Ayub Ali - Petitioner 
Versus
The State of Assam Rep. By The Commissioner and Secretary to The Govt. of Assam, Revenue and Disaster Management Department And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/6813/2024
Decided On : 24-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S C Biswas, Mr. F A Hassan
For the Respondent: GA, Assam, Mr. B Goswami, Sc

Public authorities must provide timely services and reasons for delays or rejections under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, ensuring citizens' rights are upheld.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Registration Act, 1908 - Section 21A - Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012 - Writ petition for direction to expedite registration of Sale Deed - Petitioner, a joint pattadar, sought registration after obtaining necessary NOCs - Delay in registration due to government restrictions - Court directed the Designated Public Servant to issue a speaking order on the application. (Paras 2, 3, 23)

(B) Public Service - Right to Public Service - The service of registration of Sale Deed is a notified public service under the Assam Right to Public Services Act, 2012, and must be provided within stipulated time limits. (Paras 11, 13)

(C) Administrative Discretion - Public authorities must act within the bounds of law and provide reasons for their decisions, especially when affecting citizens' rights. (Paras 20, 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, needing funds for his son's MBA, sought to sell a plot of land and applied for registration of the Sale Deed after obtaining necessary NOCs. The application was delayed without reason, prompting the writ petition. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Designated Public Servant must issue a speaking order regarding the application for registration, either allowing or rejecting it with reasons. (Paras 23)

Issues: The main issue was whether the delay in registration of the Sale Deed was justified and if the petitioner was entitled to a timely response. (Paras 3, 21)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for public authorities to provide timely services and reasons for any delays or rejections, reinforcing the right to public service under the Assam Act. (Paras 11, 23)

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions to the Designated Public Servant.

JUDGMENT :

Manish Choudhury, J.

Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. B. Goswami, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam assisted by Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam; and Mr. P. Kakoti, learned counsel for the all the respondents.

2. In this writ petition instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has projected that he is a joint pattadar and owner of a plot of land, measuring 1 Katha, covered by Dag no. 705 & K.P. Patta no. 26, situate at Village – Dangarkuchi Gaon, Mouza – Ghilazari, Barpeta Revenue Circle, District - Barpeta [‘the subject-plot’, for short]. The petitioner has further stated that the petitioner’s son is presently pursuing his course of Master of Business Administrative [MBA] at NERIM Group of Institutions at Guwahati. In order to pay admission fees and other education expenses for the MBA course, there has arisen an urgent requirement of a substantial amount of money. The petitioner has, therefore, offered to sell the subject-plot to an intended purchaser.

2.1. The petitioner has stated that after executing an agreement for sale of the subject-plot with an intended purchaser, the petitioner submitted an application for granting a No Objection Certificate [NOC] for Sale/Transfer of Land before the jurisdictional Development Authority. The petitioner has been issued a No Objection Certificate [NOC] for Sale/Transfer of the subject-plot of land by the Barpeta Development Authority, constituted under the Assam Town and Country Planning Act, 1959, on 08.08.2024. The petitioner has stated that as he was also required to get a Sale Permission / No Objection Certificate [NOC] to sell the subject-plot from the jurisdictional District Commissioner, he had also applied for Sale Permission/NOC before the respondent no. 3 on 29.05.2024 by following all the requisite formalities. After processing the application, the respondent no. 3 on 25.06.2024, issued a No Objection Certificate [NOC] for transfer of the subject-plot by way of sell, etc. to the petitioner in respect of the subject-plot.

2.2. After getting permissions from the Barpeta Development Authority and the respondent no. 3, the petitioner applied online for registration of the Sale Deed along with the afore- mentioned Sale Permissions/NOCs before the respondent no. 3, who is also the jurisdictional District Registrar. The respondent no. 3 on 03.10.2024, acknowledged the receipt of the application for Deed Registration vide Acknowledgment no. 20240002996089. While issuing acknowledgement, it was further mentioned that the petitioner could prefer an appeal if the service was not delivered within one day. The office of the District Registrar, Barpeta had also generated a Pre-Registration Summary incorporating the details for effecting registration of the Sale Deed. As the service of Deed Registration has not been provided by the District Commissioner –cum- District Registrar, Barpeta [the respondent no. 3] despite elapse of a long period without assigning any reason, the petitioner has approached this Court by the instant writ petition on 16.12.2024.

3. Mr. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has submitted all the supporting documents in support of his application for registration of Sale Deed. Despite submission of all the supporting documents, the respondent no. 3 and the respondent no. 4 have not yet disposed of the application of the petitioner. As an applicant/citizen, the petitioner at least has the right to know the reason as to why his application for registration of Sale Deed has not yet been disposed of and the petitioner has to approach the Court seeking a direction to the respondent authorities, more particularly, the respondent no. 3 and the respondent no. 4 to expedite the registration process of the Sale Deed.

4. Mr. Goswami, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam appearing for the respondents has submitted that there are valid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top