JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. S.P. Sarma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in both the writ petitions and Mr. N. Goswami, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 & 3 as well as Ms. S. Chutia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2. None appears on behalf of the respondent No.4. Also heard Mr. P.C. Biswas, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.5 & 6.

2. Both the writ petitions are taken up for disposal by this common judgment and order taking into account the factual semblance as well as the legal points being similar.

3. It appears from the perusal of the writ petitions that the petitioners in both the writ petitions had booked flats in Agrim Vista-Block-VI and entered into registered agreement for sale with the respondent No.5, who is one of the Directors of the respondent No.6. It has been stated in the writ petitions that the petitioners were issued the letters of possession and in the said letters of possession, the petitioners were instructed to complete some milestone activities before handing over the possession of the flats. Amongst those activities, one of such activity amount