Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Vijay Bishnoi, N. Unni Krishnan Nair
Union Of India Represented By The Secretary To The Overnment Of India, Ministry Of Education, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Lalchhuanawma Hrashel, S/O Lianmawia – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair J.
Heard Mr. R. K. D. Choudhury, learned Dy. SGI, appearing on behalf of the appellants. Also heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 755.
2. The present intra-Court appeal has been instituted by the appellants, herein, assailing the judgment & order, dated 19.07.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(c)14/2021.
3. The learned Single Judge vide the judgment & order, dated 19.07.2023, in WP(c)14/2021; had directed the appellants, herein, to authorize to the respondents No. 1 to 755, House Rent Allowance(HRA) at the rate applicable for ‘Y’ category cities.
4. The respondents, herein, are the teaching and non-teaching staff of Mizoram University and its constituent College. Some of the respondents were earlier appointed as teaching and non-teaching staff in the erstwhile North Eastern Hill University (NEHU) Aizawl Campus. During the period of service of the above-noted respondents, who were appointed in the North Eastern Hill University(NEHU), Aizawl Campus, they were being authorized their House Rent Allowance(HRA) at par with the employees of th
Employees of Mizoram University are entitled to House Rent Allowance at 'Y' category rates, as previous court orders and equal treatment principles apply despite city classification.
Central Government employees in the same city must receive uniform House Rent Allowance benefits, preventing discrimination based on department classifications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that accommodation provided by a Central Government autonomous body, such as IGNOU, qualifies as 'Government Accommodation' under Rule 5(c)(iii) of....
HRA is not payable if a government servant's spouse receives government accommodation; recovery of overpaid HRA is valid when claimed through misrepresentation.
The court upheld the State's authority to set ceilings on House Rent Allowance for employees, affirming that such policies are valid unless proven unconstitutional or arbitrary.
House Rent Allowance is contingent upon the acceptance of government accommodation; failure to occupy within 15 days results in forfeiture of HRA.
Government employees paying rent directly to private entities are entitled to House Rent Allowance, and denying it based on discriminatory practices is unconstitutional.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
