SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 650

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH 
Vijay Bishnoi, C.J., N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Union Of India Represented By The Secretary To The Overnment Of India, Ministry Of Education, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi – Petitioner 
Versus
Shri Lalchhuanawma Hrashel, S/O Lianmawia, Others - Respondents
WA/90/2024
Decided On : 25-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R K D Choudhury, Dy.S.G.I.
For the Respondent: Mr. S Das

Employees of Mizoram University are entitled to House Rent Allowance at 'Y' category rates, as previous court orders and equal treatment principles apply despite city classification.

Headnote:(A) Mizoram University Act, 2000 - Section 33(1) - House Rent Allowance (HRA) - The learned Single Judge directed the appellants to authorize HRA at rates applicable for ‘Y’ category cities to teaching and non-teaching staff of Mizoram University, previously under NEHU, despite the Ministry's rejection based on city classification. (Paras 3, 10, 12, 24)

(B) Classification of Cities - The classification of Aizawl as a ‘Z’ category city under the 6th and 7th Central Pay Commission does not justify denial of HRA at ‘Y’ rates to similarly placed employees. (Paras 18, 23)

(C) Court's Findings - The court found that the denial of HRA at ‘Y’ rates was discriminatory, given that other Central Government employees in Aizawl received such benefits. (Paras 22, 24)

(D) Issues - The main issues were whether the respondents were entitled to HRA at ‘Y’ rates and the justification for the Ministry's denial. (Paras 10, 12) (E) Ratio Decidendi - The court ruled that the respondents are entitled to HRA at ‘Y’ rates based on previous court orders and the principle of equal treatment for similarly situated employees. (Paras 24, 25) (F) Result - The appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's order for HRA authorization. (Paras 27)

JUDGMENT :

N. Unni Krishnan Nair J.

Heard Mr. R. K. D. Choudhury, learned Dy. SGI, appearing on behalf of the appellants. Also heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 755.

2. The present intra-Court appeal has been instituted by the appellants, herein, assailing the judgment & order, dated 19.07.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(c)14/2021.

3. The learned Single Judge vide the judgment & order, dated 19.07.2023, in WP(c)14/2021; had directed the appellants, herein, to authorize to the respondents No. 1 to 755, House Rent Allowance(HRA) at the rate applicable for ‘Y’ category cities.

4. The respondents, herein, are the teaching and non-teaching staff of Mizoram University and its constituent College. Some of the respondents were earlier appointed as teaching and non-teaching staff in the erstwhile North Eastern Hill University (NEHU) Aizawl Campus. During the period of service of the above-noted respondents, who were appointed in the North Eastern Hill University(NEHU), Aizawl Campus, they were being authorized their House Rent Allowance(HRA) at par with the employees of the North Eastern Hill University(NEHU) working at Shillong and Kohima. Although the cities of Aizawl, Shillong and Kohima, were categorized as ‘C’ category cities; the Central Government employees working in various Departments in the aforesaid cities were being authorized their House Rent Allowance(HRA) at the rates so prescribed for ‘B-2’ category cities.

5. Such benefit was being so extended to the Central Government employees working in various Departments in the above-noted cities in terms of an Office Memorandum, dated 14.05.1993.

6. The North Eastern Hill University(NEHU) authorities, had, by adopting the provisions of the Office Memorandum, dated 14.05.1993, issued a Notification, dated 17.05.1994, authorizing payment of House Rent Allowance(HRA) at the rate admissible for ‘B-2’ class cities for employees of North Eastern Hill University(NEHU) posted at Aizawl and Kohima centres w.e.f. 01.05.1991.

7. Upon enactment of the Mizoram University Act, 2000, which had come into force w.e.f. 25.04.2000; the employees serving under the erstwhile North Eastern Hill University(NEHU), were deemed to be transferred to the Mizoram University on the same terms and conditions and with the same rights and privileges as to pension, gratuity, provident fund and other matters, as they would have been authorized under the North Eastern Hill University Act, 1973, in terms of the provisions of Section 33(1) of the Mizoram University Act, 2000.

8. The Government of India, had, vide Office Memorandum, dated 29.08.2008, changed the classification of various cities from ‘A1’, ‘A’, ‘B-1’, ‘B-2’, ‘C’ and ‘Unclassified’ to that of ‘X’, ‘Y’ and ‘Z’ category cities for the purpose of authorizing to its employees, the House Rent Allowance(HRA).

9. Accordingly, the authorities of the Mizoram University had submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Human Resource and Development, Government of India(now, Ministry of Education, Government of India), for authorization of House Rent Allowance(HRA) to the employees of the Mizoram University and Pachhunga University College, at the rate as prescribed for ‘Z’ category cities, in-as-much as, vide the Office Memorandum, dated 29.08.2008; Aizawl city was classified as a ‘Z’ category city.

10. Being aggrieved, the respondents No. 1 to 755, herein, through their respective Service Associations approached the Mizoram University, praying for authorization of House Rent Allowance (HRA) in their respective cases at the rate as prescribed for ‘Y’ class city in terms of the 6th Central Pay Commission report as well as the 7th Central Pay Commission report.

11. The representations as submitted by the respondents, herein, was considered and rejected. The rejection of the representations, was communicated to the Registrar, Mizoram University, by the Minist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top