SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 683

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Asrof Kalam Azad Laskar S/o Late Ashab Uddin Laskar And Ors - Appellant  
Versus 
The State Of Assam And Ors - Respondents 
WP(C)5346 of 2024
Decided on : 01-04-2025
Advocate Appeared :
For the Appellant : MR H I CHOUDHURY, MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY, MR BHARGAV DAS, MR K P PATHAK, H YEASMIN
For the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., SC, ELECTION COMMISSION., GA, ASSAM

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR H I CHOUDHURY, MR. P K ROYCHOUDHURY, MR BHARGAV DAS, MR K P PATHAK, H YEASMIN
For the Respondent: SC, P AND R.D., SC, ELECTION COMMISSION., GA, ASSAM

The court ruled that distinct issues in writ petitions justify delinking for separate hearings to enhance judicial clarity and efficiency.

Headnote:(A) Writ Petitions - Delinking of cases - The court considered the request to delink W.P.[C] no. 901/2025 and W.P.[C] no. 909/2025 from the batch of writ petitions due to differing issues involved - The hearing for the remaining cases is scheduled for 25.03.2025. (Paras 3, 5, 6)

(B) Procedural Matters - The court emphasized the importance of addressing distinct issues in separate hearings to ensure clarity and efficiency in judicial proceedings. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners' counsel requested to delink two specific writ petitions from a larger batch due to differing issues, which the court agreed to, scheduling separate hearings.

Findings of Court:
The court ordered the delinking of the specified writ petitions and scheduled them for a separate hearing on 26.03.2025.

Issues: The main issue addressed was whether the two writ petitions should be delinked from the batch due to differing issues.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the issues in the two writ petitions were distinct enough to warrant separate consideration, thus facilitating a more focused judicial process.

Result: Writ petitions delinked and scheduled for separate hearing.

ORDER :

1. Mr. H.I. Choudhury; Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury; Mr. A.H.M.R. Choudhury; Mr. A.K. Talukdar; Ms. S.K. Nargis; and Mr. N.S. Laskar, learned counsel from the petitioners’ side are present.

2. Heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam assisted by Mr. K. Konwar, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam & Senior Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development [P&RD] Department for the State respondents.

3. As the submissions of Mr. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam are not completed, list the cases on 25.03.2025 for hearing, as sought for by him.

4. Mr. R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Election Commission [ASEC] is also in attendance.

5. Mr. A. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.[C] no. 901/2025 and Mr. A.H.M.R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.[C] no. 909/2025 have submitted that the two writ petitions, W.P.[C] no. 901/2025 & W.P.[C] no. 909/2025 are to be delinked from this batch of writ petitions as the issues involved and to be decided therein are different from this batch of writ petitions.

6. List the writ petitions, W.P.[C] no. 901/2025 & W.P.[C] no. 909/2025 separately on 26.03.2025, by delinking them from this batch of writ petitions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top