THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
M/s. Enling And Co. Represented By Its Proprietor Nang Khane Enling – Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Represented By The Secretary To The Government Of India, Department Of Finance And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.1699 Of 2025
Decided On : 01-05-2025
(A) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 29(2)(c) and 39(1) - Cancellation of GST Registration - The petitioner challenged the cancellation of GST registration on grounds of arbitrary action and lack of reasoning in the order - The Proper Officer failed to provide reasons for cancellation, violating principles of natural justice. (Paras 1, 17, 24, 25)
(B) Procedural Compliance - The Proper Officer must issue a speaking order when cancelling GST registration, detailing reasons for the decision - Non-compliance with statutory requirements renders the order invalid. (Paras 24, 25)
(C) Delay in Filing - The court acknowledged the delay in filing the writ petition but emphasized that statutory breaches outweigh the delay in seeking judicial review. (Paras 26, 30)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a proprietorship firm, had its GST registration cancelled due to non-filing of returns for six months, despite claiming inability to respond due to circumstances beyond control.
Findings of Court:
The cancellation order was quashed due to lack of reasoning and procedural non-compliance, reverting the matter back to the stage of the Show Cause Notice.
Issues: The main issues included whether the cancellation order was arbitrary and if the Proper Officer complied with the requirement to provide reasons for the cancellation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a cancellation order must be a speaking order, providing clear reasons for the decision, and failure to do so constitutes a violation of natural justice.
Result: Writ petition allowed, cancellation order quashed.
JUDGMENT :
(MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.)
The petitioner has approached this Court by the instant writ petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, on the premise that its GST Registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax [CGST] Act, 2017 has been cancelled by an Order dated 18.03.2023 pursuant to issuance of a Show Cause Notice dated 14.01.2023. The assail is made inter-alia on the grounds that the manner in which the GST Registration has been cancelled is arbitrary and the impugned Order of cancellation has been passed by the Proper Officer without due application of mind.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is a proprietorship firm, represented by its sole proprietor, which carries on business with the trade name, M/s Enling & Co. and its principal place of business at Village – Dumba, District - Changlang, Arunachal Pradesh. The petitioner got itself registered as a proprietorship firm under the Central Goods and Services Tax [CGST] Act, 2017 [‘the CGST Act’, for short]. It is stated that when the petitioner applied for registration, the petitioner was issued Registration Certificate in Form GST REG-06 with Registration no. 12AAHPE9119RIZE w.e.f. 07.08.2017 and the Registration Certificate to that effect was issued on 28.02.2018.
3. The petitioner was issued the Show Cause Notice on 14.01.2023 by the Proper Officer asking her to show cause as to why the registration issued to it under the CGST Act should not be cancelled due to failure on her part to furnish returns for a continuous period of six months. The petitioner was thereby, asked to furnish a Reply within thirty working days from the date of service of the Show Cause Notice. The petitioner was also directed to appear before the Proper Officer at 11-00 on 11.02.2023. It was further mentioned that if the petitioner would fail to furnish a Reply within the stipulated date or to appear for personal hearing on the appointed date and time, the case would be decided ex-parte on the basis of the available records and on merits. By the Show Cause Notice, the petitioner’s Registration under the CGST Act was also suspended w.e.f. 14.01.2023.
4. Thereafter on 18.03.2023, the impugned Order came to be passed whereby the petitioner’s GST Registration has been cancelled w.e.f. 18.03.2023.
5. I have heard Mr. S.K. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. B.N. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, CGST for all the respondents.
6. Mr. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in response to the Show Cause Notice, which was uploaded in the common portal, the petitioner could not submit a reply due to reasons beyond her control as it escaped her notice. No notice was served upon the petitioner manually. It is submitted that the petitioner came to learn about the Show Cause Notice when the time for filing the Reply was already over and the impugned Order dated 18.03.2023 had already been uploaded in the common portal. Though the petitioner tried to submit an application for revocation, the GST portal did not allow submission of such application as the time-limit prescribed for filing of revocation of application was already over by then. Similarly, the petitioner could not prefer an appeal due to expiry of the statutory period of limitation as well as extended period of limitation. It is submitted that the petitioner was unable to file returns for some months during Covid-19 pandemic period. Also, during the said period, the petitioner’s business suffered immensely and the business returns were nil. There was no liability of tax on account of the petitioner for the said period in respect of GST, as the petitioner’s business is very small for which the petitioner has always been furnishing nil return.
6.1. Mr. Agarwal has submitted that the impugned Order of cancellation of GST Registration is to be passed in Form GST REG-19 and the Proper Officer while cancelling a registered person’s GST Registration, has to assign reasons
A cancellation order under the CGST Act must be a speaking order, providing reasons for the decision; failure to comply renders the order invalid.
A cancellation order under the CGST Act must be a speaking order, providing reasons for the decision to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice.
The cancellation of GST registration must be supported by a reasoned order; failure to provide reasons renders the order illegal and violates principles of natural justice.
An administrative authority must provide reasons for its decisions, especially when such decisions adversely affect individuals, to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice.
The cancellation of GST Registration without providing reasons violates principles of natural justice and statutory requirements, rendering the order illegal.
An order cancelling a registration under statutory provisions must be a speaking order, assigning specific reasons for the decision. The failure of an assessee to respond to a show cause notice does ....
A cancellation of GST registration must be a speaking order, providing clear reasons for its decision, especially when it entails adverse civil consequences.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.