THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ROBIN PHUKAN
Anwar Hussain, S/o Late Sahjahan Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam, Represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Department of School Education, Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(ROBIN PHUKAN, J.)
Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. H. Terangpi, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education Department, appearing for respondent Nos.1—3 and Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department, appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5.
2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, namely, Anwar Hussain has challenged the correctness or otherwise of the letter dated 15.11.2022, issued by the respondent No.2, whereby the petitioner was denied the benefit of pay protection of his earlier post of Lecturer in Sibsagar College, in the post of District Elementary Education Officer (DEEO) and also to provide him consequential benefit of pension and other retiral benefits.
3. The background facts leading to filing of the present writ petition is briefly stated as under:-
“The petitioner was serving as Lecturer of Philosophy in Sibsagar College against a valid sanctioned post and he was receiving UGC scale of pay. Pursuant to an advertisement dated 25.12.1989 for filling up of posts of 8 nos. of Inspector of Schools/Deputy Directors/District Elementary Education Officer, the
Pay protection is a fundamental right under Articles 21 and 300A, and denial based on procedural delays is impermissible.
The delay in approaching the court does not affect the claim for pay protection and higher pension, and the recurring cause of action in matters of pay scale and consequential pension justifies the r....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Rule 23 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002 in the context of pay protection for employees transi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prescribed scale of pay in the recruitment notification for direct recruitment to government schools prevails over claims for pay protecti....
The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision granting pay protection, emphasizing adherence to established legal precedents and rejecting arbitrary distinctions in pay protection e....
Entitlement to pay protection and stepping up pay in line with the principle of equal pay.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to proper pay fixation based on past service in aided schools, as protected under FR 22(B) and G.O.Ms.No.367, and the violation ....
Point of Law : State being a Model Employer, cannot be permitted to discriminate between similarly situated persons and the petitioners are entitled for the pay protection which they are seeking by w....
The court established that actions affecting employment rights must comply with natural justice, requiring a hearing before adverse decisions.
The court ruled that recruitment rules existing at the time of advertisement govern terms of appointment, and any retrospective application of subsequent rules is unconstitutional and violates the pr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.