SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 730

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH 
Devashis Baruah, J.
North East Transmission Company Limited – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam Rep. By The Commissioner And Secretary and ors. – Respondents
CRP/68/2023, CRP/100/2023, CRP/101/2023, CRP/102/2023, CRP/104/2023, CRP/135/2024, CRP/136/2024, CRP/137/2024, CRP/61/2023, CRP/62/2023, CRP/63/2023, CRP/64/2023, CRP/65/2023, CRP/69/2023, CRP/70/2023, CRP/71/2023, CRP/72/2023, CRP/73/2023, CRP/74/2023, CRP/75/2023, CRP/76/2023, CRP/77/2023, CRP/79/2023, CRP/80/2023, CRP/82/2023, CRP/85/2023, CRP/87/2023, CRP/89/2023, CRP/90/2023, CRP/91/2023, CRP/92/2023, CRP/94/2023, CRP/95/2023, CRP/96/2023, CRP/97/2023, CRP/98/2023
Decided On : 25-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. NC Das, Senior Advocate, Ms. M Devi
For the Respondent: Mr. K Bhattacharjee, Mr. RA Choudhury

The right to apply for compensation sufficiency under Section 16 of the Telegraph Act arises only when a dispute exists, and acceptance of compensation does not bar further claims.

Headnote:(A) Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 16 - Compensation claims - Various applications challenging orders awarding compensation under Section 16 of the Act - Petitioner contended that claims were barred by limitation as per Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 - Court held that the right to apply arises only when a dispute regarding compensation sufficiency arises, and the applications were not barred by limitation. (Paras 39-50)

(B) Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 137 - Applicability to compensation claims - Court clarified that the limitation period begins when the right to apply accrues, which is contingent upon the existence of a dispute. (Paras 39-50)

(C) Welfare legislation - The court emphasized that Section 16 of the Act is designed to ensure just compensation for affected parties, rejecting technical objections to claims. (Paras 42-50)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged multiple orders awarding compensation under Section 16 of the Telegraph Act, arguing that the claims were filed beyond the limitation period and that claimants had accepted compensation without protest.

Findings of Court:
The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims regarding limitation and upheld the lower court's orders, emphasizing the welfare nature of the legislation.

Issues: The main issues included whether the applications were barred by limitation and whether acceptance of compensation without protest precluded further claims.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the right to apply for compensation sufficiency arises only upon a dispute, and acceptance of compensation does not bar subsequent claims under Section 16.

Result: Applications dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Devashis Baruah, J.

Heard Mr. NC Das, the learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. M Devi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. K Bhattacharjee, the learned Government Advocate, Assam appears on behalf of the State respondents and Mr. RA Choudhury, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the claimants/private respondents in the instant batch of proceedings except the claimants in CRP No.95/2023. Taking into consideration, the order which this Court proposes to pass, the appearance of the claimants in CRP No.95/2023 are dispensed with.

2. Taking into account the grounds on which the present applications are filed invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, this Court takes up all these applications together for disposal by this common judgment and order. For the sake of clarity, this Court would give a brief detail of the challenge made in the instant batch of applications.

3. CRP No.68/2023

In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 19.09.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.42/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.3,14,470/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Telegraph Act, 1885 (for short, the Act of 1885). It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.

4. CRP No.61/2023

In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.06/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.10,94,169/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.

5. CRP No.62/2023

In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.26/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.9,90,199.86p along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.

6. CRP No.63/2023

In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.12/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.1,61,200/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.

7. CRP No.64/2023

In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.40/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.9,47,268.58p along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.

8. CRP No.65/2023

In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.59/2015, whereby an amount of Rs.2,72,400/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.

9. CRP No.69/2023

In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 18.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.24/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.8,83,130/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top