IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Devashis Baruah, J.
North East Transmission Company Limited – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam Rep. By The Commissioner And Secretary and ors. – Respondents
CRP/68/2023, CRP/100/2023, CRP/101/2023, CRP/102/2023, CRP/104/2023, CRP/135/2024, CRP/136/2024, CRP/137/2024, CRP/61/2023, CRP/62/2023, CRP/63/2023, CRP/64/2023, CRP/65/2023, CRP/69/2023, CRP/70/2023, CRP/71/2023, CRP/72/2023, CRP/73/2023, CRP/74/2023, CRP/75/2023, CRP/76/2023, CRP/77/2023, CRP/79/2023, CRP/80/2023, CRP/82/2023, CRP/85/2023, CRP/87/2023, CRP/89/2023, CRP/90/2023, CRP/91/2023, CRP/92/2023, CRP/94/2023, CRP/95/2023, CRP/96/2023, CRP/97/2023, CRP/98/2023
Decided On : 25-03-2025
JUDGMENT :
Devashis Baruah, J.
Heard Mr. NC Das, the learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. M Devi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. K Bhattacharjee, the learned Government Advocate, Assam appears on behalf of the State respondents and Mr. RA Choudhury, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the claimants/private respondents in the instant batch of proceedings except the claimants in CRP No.95/2023. Taking into consideration, the order which this Court proposes to pass, the appearance of the claimants in CRP No.95/2023 are dispensed with.
2. Taking into account the grounds on which the present applications are filed invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, this Court takes up all these applications together for disposal by this common judgment and order. For the sake of clarity, this Court would give a brief detail of the challenge made in the instant batch of applications.
3. CRP No.68/2023
In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 19.09.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.42/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.3,14,470/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Telegraph Act, 1885 (for short, the Act of 1885). It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.
4. CRP No.61/2023
In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.06/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.10,94,169/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.
5. CRP No.62/2023
In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.26/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.9,90,199.86p along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.
6. CRP No.63/2023
In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.12/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.1,61,200/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.
7. CRP No.64/2023
In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.40/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.9,47,268.58p along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.
8. CRP No.65/2023
In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 12.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.59/2015, whereby an amount of Rs.2,72,400/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall be deducted from the total amount payable to the claimants.
9. CRP No.69/2023
In the instant application, the petitioner herein had assailed the order passed on 18.08.2022 in Misc. (P.G) Case No.24/2016, whereby an amount of Rs.8,83,130/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition was awarded as compensation under Section 16 of the Act of 1885. It was further observed that the amount already paid shall
The right to apply for compensation sufficiency under Section 16 of the Telegraph Act arises only when a dispute exists, and acceptance of compensation does not bar further claims.
Compensation claims under the Indian Telegraph Act must be filed within three years of the cause of action, with failure to adhere resulting in dismissal due to limitation.
The court emphasized the necessity of framing the issue of limitation, stating it is fundamental to jurisdiction; failure to assess it leads to a quashed decision.
(1) Damages suffered by erection of transmission lines and towers – For determining rights of various parties to receive compensation in case there is inter se dispute, certain amount of evidence wou....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.