SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 831

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH 
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Bishnu Priya Rabha D/o Shri Jagat Rabha - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam and Others - Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 6394 of 2024
Decided On : 11-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : A.F.N.U. Mollah, K. Zaman

A registration authority cannot deny eligibility when the candidates have previously been accepted based on verified qualifications, as per regulations.

Headnote:(A) Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Section 10 - Educational Regulations 1991, for Diploma Course in Pharmacy - Registration of Pharmacists denied on grounds of non-passing of certain subjects in Higher Secondary exams - The petitioners having followed all admission protocols were deemed eligible for course completion - The Assam Pharmacy Council's refusal was held perverse, as the petitioners were admitted with verified qualifications and completed the required internship. (Paras 1-4, 20, 30)

(B) Administrative Authority’s Discretion - There is a limit to the authority's discretion in denying registration based on qualifications that were previously accepted and scrutinized by other educational authorities. (Paras 26-28)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners completed their Diploma in Pharmacy from recognized institutes after fulfilling the eligibility criteria as stipulated by the Srimanta Sankardeva University. They were denied registration by the Assam Pharmacy Council due to claims of ineligibility based on unrevealed grounds.

Findings of Court:
The authorities had verified the petitioners' qualifications and admitted them to the course; therefore, refusal of registration was unjustifiable.

Issues: Whether the Assam Pharmacy Council's refusal to register based on incomplete information contravenes the rights of the petitioners who completed the required educational training?

Ratio Decidendi: The court held the petitioners complied with all necessary educational regulations for registration as Pharmacists since they possessed a valid diploma after recognized training.

Result: Writ petition allowed, with directions to register names as Pharmacists.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for pharmacist registration (Para 2 , 3)
2. petitioners' qualifications and application process (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. state's argument on ineligibility of petitioners (Para 11 , 12)
4. court's examination of eligibility criteria (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. confirmation of petitioners' passing status (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
6. response to objection raised by pharmacy council (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. legal position on admission verification (Para 27 , 28)
8. petitioners' eligibility for registration confirmed (Para 29)
9. court's directive for registration and conclusion (Para 30 , 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT :

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.

1. Heard Mr. R. Amin, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of petitioners. Also heard Mr. Buddhadip Gogoi, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam, appearing on behalf of all the respondents.

2. The grievance raised in the present petition by the petitioners, herein, is the denial to them, registration as Pharmacists by the Assam Pharmacy Council, after they had acquired the requisite qualification in terms of the provisions of the PHARMACY ACT 1945, read with the Educational Regulations 1991, for diploma course in Pharmacy.

3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding, is noticed as under:

The petitioners, herein, in response to Educational Notices, 12-05-2017 and 04-06-2018, issued by the Registrar and Controller of Examinations, Srimanta Sankardeva University of Health Sciences, Guwahati, inviting applications, amongst others, for admission into Diploma in Pharmacy courses in institutes under the Director of Medical Education, Assam, for the Sessions 2017 and 2018, respectively, had submitted their respective applications for the same. While the petitioner No. 1 had so submitted his application in pursuance of the Educational Notice, dated 12-05-2017. The petitioners No. 2 & 3, had so submitted their respective applications in pursuance of the Educational Notice, dated 04-06-2018. The petitioners, thereafter, participated in the selection process and on qualifying therein, the names of the petitioners were shortlisted and they were required to appear in the counselling process. In the counselling process, the educational certificates of the petitioners, more particularly, their Higher Secondary(Science) qualification mark-sheets and certificates were duly examined and thereafter, basing on the recommendations so made; the Director of Medical Education, Assam, issued notices, admitting the petitioners, herein, into the Institutes of Pharmacy under the control of the Directorate of Medical Education, Assam.

The petitioner No. 1 was admitted into the Institute of Pharmacy attached to the Silchar Medical College & Hospital, Silchar, in the year 2018, while the petitioner No. 2 was admitted into the same Institute of Pharmacy attached to the Silchar Medical College & Hospital, Silchar, in the year 2019. The petitioner No. 3 was admitted into the Institute of Pharmacy attached to the Assam Medical College & Hospital, Dibrugarh, in the year 2019.

It is to be noted here that the petitioners No. 1 & 2, herein, had completed their final Diploma in Pharmacy course from the Institute of Pharmacy attached to the Silchar Medical College & Hospital, Silchar, in the year 2001, while the petitioner No. 3 had successfully cleared the said course from the Institute of Pharmacy attached to the Assam Medical College & Hospital, Dibrugarh, in the year 2022.

Thereafter, in terms of the Educational Regulations 1991, for Diploma Course in Pharmacy; the petitioners, herein, underwent the mandatory Internship Training in their respective Institutes wherein they had pursued their Diploma in Pharmacy course. The petitioners on successful completion of the various stages of the Diploma in Pharmacy course, were issued with their respective Diplomas.

Having acquired the eligibility for being registered as Pharmacists, the petitioners No. 1 & 2, h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top