SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(UK) 151

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.
Pratibha Rawat - Petitioner
Versus
Pharmacy Council State of Uttarakhand and others – Respondents
Writ Petition Misc. Single No.328 of 2024 With Writ Petition Misc. Single No.329 of 2024
Decided On : 12-02-2026 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sandeep Kothari and Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Ms. Seema Sah, Advocate, Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate, Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate.

Student completing diploma without fraud or suppression, despite 10+2 technical ineligibility, entitled to pharmacist registration; fault of admitting institution not to prejudice after certification.

Headnote:(A) Pharmacy Education Regulations, 2020 - Chapter II Regulation IV; Chapter I Regulation 2 - Qualification for registration as pharmacist - Pass in Diploma in Pharmacy (Parts I, II & III) - Minimum admission qualification: 10+2 with physics, chemistry, biology or mathematics - Petitioner failed chemistry theory in 10+2 but disclosed marks, admitted via counseling by affiliated institute and technical board after document verification, completed diploma, obtained passing certificate - No fraud, suppression or misrepresentation - Fault of admitting institution - Petitioner not to suffer after course completion and lateral entry to degree course - Registration directed. (Paras 3,5,6,7,11,12-16)

(B) Equity in professional admissions - Absent knowledge of eligibility norms by student, and with full disclosure, institutional lapse in verification should not prejudice student who invests time in studies - Analogy to Supreme Court holding permitting continuation despite initial ineligibility to avoid blighting future. (Paras 13,14,15)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner passed 10+2 examination declared pass on best-five subjects basis despite failing chemistry theory (17 marks), submitted documents for diploma admission counseling, admitted by institute affiliated to technical board after affidavit verification, completed two-year diploma in first division, obtained certificate, applied for registration denied on 10+2 ineligibility, meanwhile pursuing lateral entry to degree course.

Findings of Court:
Respondent council directed to register petitioner based on course completion certificate issued by institute and technical board.

Issues: Whether failure to pass chemistry theory in 10+2 bars diploma-based pharmacist registration despite completion certificate sans fraud; propriety of council questioning admission validity post-course.

Ratio Decidendi: No presumption student knew precise eligibility; full disclosure shifts fault to institution/board for admitting and certifying; denial post-completion causes grave injustice after years invested, equity demands registration.

Result: Writ petitions allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's 10+2, d.pharm completion, registration application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. pci regulations require 10+2 pcb pass for d.pharm. (Para 5)
3. no fraud; institute responsible; precedent favors registration. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10)
4. chemistry failure disqualifies d.pharm admission eligibility. (Para 9 , 11)
5. petitioner disclosed marks; no suppression or fraud. (Para 12 , 13)
6. student not penalized for institute's admission error. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Purohit, J.

Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPMS No.328 of 2024 alone are being considered and discussed.

2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a direction to respondent no.1 to register the petitioner, as Pharmacist, on the basis of two year diploma (D. Pharma course) obtained by the petitioner from respondent no.2-Institute affiliated to respondent no.4- Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education, Roorkee, and consequently the petitioner be issued the registration certificate from respondent no.1-Council.

3. Brief facts of the case for proper adjudication of the issue are that the petitioner before this Court has passed her Senior School Certificate Examination, 2020 (Intermediate Examination) from S.G.N. Senior Secondary School, Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar, affiliated to Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi. The petitioner has passed the aforesaid examination with the following subjects:-

i. English

ii. Physics

iii. Painting

iv. Biology

v. Physical education

vi. Chemistry

vii. Work experience

viii. Health and physical education

ix. General studies.

Post passing the aforesaid Senior School Certificate Examination, the petitioner has been issued a Marks Statement (Mark Sheet) in which it was categorically mentioned that the petitioner has passed the aforesaid examination and thereafter the Central Board of Secondary Education has also issued a pass certificate in the aforesaid subjects, in the year 2020 itself. Thereafter the petitioner participated in the process of selection for a two year diploma course from the institutes affiliated to Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education, Roorkee, Haridwar and has taken admission in diploma in Pharmacy in Global Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jaspur, respondent no.2 herein and she has completed the aforesaid Pharmacy Diploma course in the academic session 2020-21 and 2021-22, and the final year mark sheet of the aforesaid diploma Examination-2022 (summer) was issued by the Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education, Roorkee. In the aforesaid result so declared clearly shows that the petitioner has passed the aforesaid diploma examination in the year 2002 in first division. Subsequent thereto certificate has also been issued by the Uttarakhand board of Technical Education in which it was clearly mentioned that the petitioner has completed a two year diploma course in pharmacy from the Global Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jaspur, in first division. Post completion of the aforesaid diploma course, the petitioner has again applied for the lateral entry in the B.Pharma course from the same institute namely Global Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jaspur, inasmuch as, there are two modes of entry in the B.Pharma course, firstly after completion of intermediate examination, direct admission to B.Pharma Course first year can be taken and other mode is the persons who are holding diploma in pharmacy can have a lateral entry directly in the second year i.e., third semester of the B.Pharma course and accordingly the petitioner before this Court has taken the lateral entry in the B.Pharma course from the Global Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jaspur in the academic year

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top