IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Ananda Kheruar S/o Shri Petra Kheruar – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND, J.
1. Heard learned counsel Mr. S. Das for the appellant Ananda Kheruar who has filed this appeal challenging the Judgment and Order dated 12.07.2019, passed by the learned Special Judge, Udalguri, Assam in connection with Special POCSO Case No. 16/2018, convicting the appellant under Section 365 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC for short) and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- with default stipulation and further convicting him under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, (POSCO Act for short) and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 4000/- with default stipulation.
2. Heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State and learned Amicus Curiae, Dr. P. Agarwal for the informant.
3. The genesis of the case was that the victim, 'X', a student of Class-X left her home at about 7 a.m. on 05.02.2018 and did not return. It is alleged that the appellant kidnapped the victim and committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim. An FIR was lodged which was registered as Harisinga P.S. Case No. 05/2018
The court affirmed the victim's testimony in sexual offense cases, establishing age determination as crucial in assessing culpability while allowing for a more lenient sentence under the POCSO Act po....
The court acquitted the appellant due to reasonable doubt regarding the victim's credibility and inconsistencies in her testimony.
It stands well settled that circumstances not put to an accused under Section 313 Cr.PC. cannot be used against him and must be excluded from consideration - In a criminal trial, importance of questi....
Point of Law : Prosecution has failed to prove beyond doubt that the victim was below 18 years of age as on the date of the incident. Under these circumstances, the accused cannot be held guilty of o....
The court reaffirmed that the victim's testimony is decisive in sexual offence cases, and a minor's age must be established based on consistent evidence, including oral testimonies.
The court emphasized that mere admissibility of evidence does not establish its probative value, particularly when witness testimonies are inconsistent and influenced, raising reasonable doubt regard....
The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the victim's age beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing that consent from a minor is not legally valid under the POCSO Act.
Rape of minor girl - Conviction set aside - Subsequent refusal to marry cannot be come within the purview of cheating.
The court upheld the conviction for abduction and rape based on testimonial and medical evidence, emphasizing the validity of medical age assessment in absence of primary documents.
The prosecution must establish the age of the victim beyond reasonable doubt in cases under the POCSO Act; failure to provide adequate evidence leads to acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.