Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
S.B. Enterprise, rep. By Its Proprietor Shri Sanjib Bhattacherjee – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, rep. By The Chief Secy. To The Govt. Of Assam – Respondent
ORDER :
(MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, J.)
Heard Mr. L. Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. R. R.Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel for the PHE Department.
2. The petitioner’s case is that he was asked to supply low cost materials, vide supply orders dated 08.10.2013. The Chief Engineer (PHE)B&S, Assam had stipulated that the delivery period for supply of the low cost sanitary materials would be 120 days. Out of the 1,73,701/- units, for Silchar Division No. 2, Nalbari, Morigaon, Tezpur Division No. 2, Guwahati Division No. 1 and Nagaon Division, the petitioner supplied 79,758 units. However, the balance 100943 units of low cost sanitary materials were not accepted because of storage problem by the authority.
3. The petitioner’s further case is that citing delayed delivery, the Chief Engineer, PHE has issued the impugned letter dated 04.06.2015, wherein it was alleged that the petitioner failed to supply the materials within the stipulated period, which had hindered the progress of construction of individual house-hold latrines (IHHL) in the State. Therefore, the supply order was cancelled and the petitioner was asked to receive payment for supply made until 31.05.2015.
4. The petiti
Parties must be afforded notice and opportunity before order cancellation; however, if compliance is not met, suppliers may be deemed in breach, necessitating civil litigation for damages.
Section 34 of Kerala Municipality Act provides that every standing Committee, other Committees and Secretary shall be bound to give effect to every resolution of Council unless such resolution is sus....
All that stand taken by respondents indicates that there is no technical sanction and verification was done after one year and during one year, there may have been misplacing or theft of articles tha....
A writ petition under Article 226 requires evidential support for claims; absence thereof precludes the issuance of a writ for payment.
A party entitled to payment for supplied goods may seek relief in court if the payment is delayed, affirming the legal obligation to honor contracts without undue delay.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
