Back
RAJESH SHANKAR
Data Tech – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present case is taken up today through video conferencing.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing letter no. 948 dated 28.08.2018 issued by the Joint Director, Shri Krishna Institute of Public Administration, Ranchi (the respondent no. 5) whereby the petitioner has been informed that due to certain reasons, supply order as contained in Letter No. 74 dated 14.06.2018 has been cancelled by the respondent no. 4 and thus the petitioner has been requested to take back 18 computers as well as 01 multifunctional Laser Jet Printer of “HP Company” supplied by it through challan no. 40/18 dated 09.07.2018. Further prayer has been made for directing the respondents to make payment of the admitted dues of Rs. 11,22,357/- along with suitable interest to the petitioner against invoice dated 09.07.2018 with respect to supply of 18 numbers of desktop computers (Dell) and one multipurpose Laser Jet Printer (HP) to Shri Krishna Institute of Public Administration, Government of Jharkhand (respondent no. 3) which have already been installed and are functional.
3. The factual background of the case as stated in the writ petition is that the Department of Planning-cum-F
The court upheld the respondent's right to withhold payments due to the petitioner's failure to fulfill supply obligations, emphasizing that contractual disputes should be resolved through appropriat....
Public distribution system – Cancellation of licence - Cancellation of Absence of reasoning as to the mandatory requirement of provision which conferred jurisdiction on the quasi judicial authority o....
Quasi-judicial authorities must issue reasoned decisions for transparency and accountability, ensuring that justice is both done and perceived to be done.
The dismissal of a writ petition due to the petitioner's repeated non-appearance in hearings illustrates the necessity of adherence to principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
The importance of full and fair disclosure of all material facts when invoking the court's jurisdiction, and the consequences of suppressing material facts in a writ petition.
Once the award is notified and the contract is executed, the tender cannot be unilaterally cancelled. Arbitrary cancellation of a tender by a state authority is violative of Article 14 of the Constit....
The petitioner's duty to disclose all material facts without suppression or distortion, and the consequences of failing to do so, as established by the court's decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
