Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Irungbam Anil Meetei S/o Irungbam Dev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeals process and evidence sufficiency. (Para 1 , 3 , 66) |
| 2. details of the appellant's conviction and the facts of the case. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding procedural violations during the search and seizure. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. procedural lapses in handling drug evidence. (Para 11) |
| 5. discussion on compliance with the ndps act’s procedural requirements. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. retention of custody of evidence. (Para 16 , 34) |
| 7. legal obligations of ncb during seizure. (Para 18) |
| 8. witness testimonies corroborating the search and seizure process. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. final court observations and conclusions regarding the trial court's decision. (Para 46 , 68 , 70) |
JUDGMENT :
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND, J.
1. Heard Mr. N. H. Barbhuiya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant.
2. This is an appeal challenging the Judgment And Order dated 19.07.2018, in connection with NDPS Case No. 62 of 2017, whereby and whereunder, the appellant was convicted under Section 20 (b) (ii) (C) of the NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 (ten) years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with default stipulation.
3.
Compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act is necessary, but substantial evidence can uphold convictions despite procedural lapses.
Failure to comply with mandatory procedures under the NDPS Act vitiates conviction, necessitating primary evidence for a valid trial.
Possession of narcotic substances can result in conviction under NDPS despite procedural non-compliance if evidentiary strength supports prosecution's claims.
Recovery of Ganja – Samples drawn in presence of Magistrate and list thereof on being certified alone would constitute primary evidence for the purposes of trial.
Section 52A deals with disposal of seized drugs and psychotropic substances.
The prosecution must comply with mandatory procedural requirements in drug cases, failing which foundational facts required to establish guilt cannot be met, leading to acquittal.
The prosecution must establish a prima facie case and prove the chain of custody for contraband under the NDPS Act; failure to do so undermines the conviction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
