SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 978

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT
Soumitra Saikia, J.
M/S Bharat Trading Corporation - Petitioner
Versus
State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Department of Finance & Taxation and ors. – Respondents
W.P(C) NO. 6108/2022, W.P(C) NO. 6111/2022, W.P(C) NO. 6112/2022, W.P(C) NO. 6113/2022
Decided On : 06-06-2025 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Dr. A. Saraf, Sr. Advocate Mr. P.K. Bora, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. B. Choudhury, Standing Counsel

The court ruled that non-furnishing of 'C' Forms by a purchaser due to financial distress does not absolve entitlement to tax exemptions under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Headnote:(A) CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT, 1956 - Sections 3, 6(2), and 8 - Subsequent sale in course of inter-state trade - The petitioner claimed exemption from Central Sales Tax on supplies to a registered dealer. Due to non-issuance of 'C' Forms by the purchaser's corporation, assessment raised against the petitioner for various assessment years was challenged. The Court held that the petitioner should not be penalized for non-furnishing of 'C' Forms when the sales do not contradict the provisions. The impugned orders of assessment were quashed, and benefits under Section 6(2) were to be granted. (Paras 62 and 63)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, engaged in supplying caustic soda, faced tax demands due to the non-receipt of statutory 'C' Forms despite continuous follow-ups with the Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited, the receiver of goods. The corporation was under financial difficulties, ultimately leading to its liquidation and takeover by the State.

Findings of Court:
The sales made by the petitioner were found to be legitimate inter-state sales, and the non-receipt of 'C' Forms was attributed to issues arising from the corporation's financial crisis and subsequent liquidation.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to exemptions despite the non-receipt of 'C' Forms due to circumstances beyond its control?

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the non-furnishing of 'C' Forms by the corporation cannot hinder the exemption eligibility of the petitioner under Section 6(2) when the sale particulars corroborate inter-state trade execution.

Result: The writ petitions were allowed, and assessment orders causing demands were quashed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of petitioner's business (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. establishment of transactions and non-receipt of c-forms (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments regarding c-forms and tax implications (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. arguments regarding c forms and tax liabilities. (Para 18)
5. petitioner's liability for non-submission of c-forms (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
6. respondent's counterarguments against petitioner's claims (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27)
7. examination of inter-state trade and sales tax exemptions. (Para 39 , 46)
8. court's final ruling on the claim for tax exemptions. (Para 58)
9. court's directive based on prior rulings (Para 60 , 61)
10. final judgment and conclusion of the case (Para 62 , 63)

JUDGMENT :

Soumitra Saikia, J.

The writ petitioner before this Court is a partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, 1932 and having its Office at 76 MS Road, Athgaon, Guwahati-781001, Assam. The petitioner is a dealer engaged in sale and supply of acids and chemicals. All the partners of the petitioner firm are citizens of India and as such they are entitled to all the rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution of India and the laws framed thereunder from time to time. The petitioner firm at the relevant year was duly registered under the CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT , 1956 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1956”) and is represented before this Court by one the partners.

2. For the period 2013-14, the petitioner firm made supplies of caustic soda to Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd. namely the respondent No. 4 by way of e-way transactions and raised bills on the respondent No.4/ Company in respect of which the said company was required to issue declaration Forms “C” under the provisions of the Act of 1956.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner received an order from the Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited for supply of caustic soda. The Petitioner purchased the said item from a registered dealer outside the State of Assam and when the goods were in course of movement in inter-state trade and commerce by transfer of documents of title to the goods, supplied the same to the Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited. Such supply is a subsequent sale in course of inter-state trade and commerce. As per Section 16(2) of the CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT , 1956, subsequent sale made in course of interstate trade and commerce is exempted from the payment of Central Sales Tax on the dealer furnishing a declaration Form - ‘E-1’ from the dealer making the first sale and a declaration in Form — ‘C’ from the recipient of the goods i.e. ultimate purchaser. Thereby the Petitioner was required to produce Form — ‘E-1’ from dealer outside the State of Assam from whom the Petitioner purchased the caustic soda in course of interstate trade and commerce and a declaration Form —‘C’ from the Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited and on production of the ‘E-1’ Form and ‘C’ Form, the Petitioner was not liable to make payment of the Central Sales Tax in respect of the supply of caustic soda to the Hindustan Paper Corporation of India.

4. It is submitted that the Petitioner raised the bills on account of supply of caustic soda by making a subsequent sale for transfer of document title of goods during the movement of the said goods during inter-state trade and commerce and procured Form — ‘E-1’ from the first selling dealer and clearly mentioned in the invoices issued to the Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited that the sale remain even sales transactions and the name of the first supplier of the goods was also mentioned. In the said invoices it was also clearly mentioned that the Form ‘C’ was to be received from the Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited.

5. It is submitted that during the year 2013-14, the Petitioner made E-1 purchases to the tune of Rs. 5,85,96,987/- (including tax) and made E-1 sales to the tune of Rs. 7,53,13,785/- to the Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited. The Hindustan Paper Corporation submitted its ‘C’

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top