Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
NELSON SAILO
No. G/5017953N Ex Rifleman GD Sunil Kumar Rabha S/o Late Ramdhan Rabha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Rep. by the Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NELSON SAILO, J.
1. Heard Mr. S. Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned CGC appearing for the respondents.
2. By filing this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order by which he has been discharged from service on 01.10.2013 from the post of Rifleman (GD) Assam Rifles on the ground that he had never sought for being discharged from service and the same therefore should be set aside.
3. Brief facts of the case is that the petitioner was appointed as a Rifleman (GD) under the 30th Battalion Assam Rifles on 15.05.2009. Thereafter, he has been serving as such with due diligence. On 03.04.2013, while he was posted at 30th Battalion Assam, Mantripukhri, Manipur, he was allotted night duty upto 2:00 am. The petitioner while returning from his duty was tired and due to the darkness, he mistakenly knocked the door of his nearby quarter of one Shri S.C. Das, Rifleman (GD). The wife of Shri S.C. Das opened the door and without giving any chance to the petitioner to explain himself started abusing him and shouted on top of her voice. The petitioner being nervous instead of returning to his quarter went back to the place of his duty. On 03.04.2013
Discharge from service is valid when supported by proper documentation and an individual's own consent, even if allegations of duress are made without substantial evidence.
Discharge from service upheld as valid; allegations of coercion and violation of natural justice not substantiated, reaffirming that factual disputes cannot be adjudicated under Article 226.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of the application for discharge, approval process, and the lack of entitlement to pensionary benefits due to resignation at own r....
Discharge from service must adhere to procedural requirements, including adequate warnings and documentation, as stipulated in the governing rules.
The court ruled that a discharge application must be voluntary and properly examined; failure to do so invalidates subsequent actions.
Discharges based on multiple red ink entries are valid under Assam Rifles Records Office Instructions, provided due process is followed, including issuance of a show-cause notice.
Disciplinary proceedings under the Assam Rifles Act upheld; the court confirmed that the punishment of compulsory retirement was proportionate to the petitioner's offense of remaining OSL for 1166 da....
Procedural fairness is paramount in discharge proceedings; the failure to conduct an impartial enquiry before discharging an individual as an incorrigible offender invalidates the discharge order.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters involving members of the Armed Forces and the need for a higher standard of discipline.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
