SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 436

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
RAJESH MAZUMDAR, J.
Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Iswar Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 1602 of 2019
Decided On : 12-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Bora
For the Respondent: A. Gayan

Procedural fairness is paramount in discharge proceedings; the failure to conduct an impartial enquiry before discharging an individual as an incorrigible offender invalidates the discharge order.

Headnote:(A) Assam Rifles Act, 2006 - Sections 11(1)/(2) - Assam Rifles Regulation, 2016 - Discharge of soldier - Petitioner discharged as an incorrigible offender based on four red ink entries without following the proper procedure under Regulation 107 - Show cause notice given, but no impartial enquiry conducted as required - Court finds procedural lapse, interferes with discharge order and reinstates petitioner, directing appropriate next steps for backwages. (Paras 25, 24, 21)

(B) Service Discharge - Principles of natural justice - Must be observed in procedural hearings, and proper avenues for representation must be provided before discharge is executed, ensuring the affected individual understands the basis of the actions taken against them. (Paras 11, 22, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a Rifleman in the Assam Rifles, received multiple red ink entries resulting in discharge via a show cause notice citing incorrigibility, without following necessary procedures under applicable regulations regarding procedural fairness. The competent authority was found to bypass required steps prior to the discharge.

Findings of Court:
The court held the process leading to the petitioner’s discharge lacked adherence to necessary procedural requirements, thereby invalidating the discharge order and ordering reinstatement with consideration for back wages during the period of absence.

Issues: Whether the proper procedure was followed under Regulation 107 for the discharge of the petitioner as an incorrigible offender and the implications of procedural lapses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that procedural fairness must be upheld, and where an individual is accused of being an incorrigible offender, the process under Regulation 107 requires an impartial enquiry prior to any action being taken against them. Discharge under Regulation 108 was not applicable without such inquiry.

Result: Order dated 20.10.2018 set aside; the petitioner reinstated.

Table of Content
1. discharge from service based on conduct. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. necessity of procedural adherence in discharges. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. arguments on procedural lapses in discharging authority. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. court's analysis on the procedural errors in discharging. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. consequential relief and reinstatement followed by evaluation. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
6. final order on the petition. (Para 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH MAZUMDAR, J.

1. Heard Ms. S. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. A. Gayan, learned CGC appearing for the respondents.

2. The bone of contention in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is the manner, in which, the petitioner has been discharged from his services as a Rifleman/General Duty from the Assam Rifles by the order dated 20th October, 2018. As per the undisputed records, the petitioner had joined his services as a Rifleman/General Duty on 29.09.2007 in Assam Rifles and during the course of his service, he earned four red ink entries on 06.07.2013, 30.09.2017, 29th January, 2018 and 30th May, 2018 respectively.

3. On 26th June, 2018, Col/Officiating DIG of Headquarter 27 Sector Assam Rifle had issued a show cause notice to the petitioner to the following effect:-

CONFIDENTIAL

12095/A/18/069

HQ- 27 Sect AR

No.G/5013846P Rfn/GD

PIN 932 527

C/o 99 APO

Sandeep Kumar

25 Assam Rifles

PIN- 932 025

C/o 99 APO

SHOW CAUSE NOTICE

1. You were enrolled as Rect (GD) on 29 Sep 2007 in Assam Rifles. Thereafter, in your service of 10 years, 08 months and 02 days (as on 01 Jun 2018), you have incurred 04 (four) Red Ink Entries in your service dossier. The details of the offences are as given below:-

2. It is clear from above that you inspite of having been advised many times to Improve in your conduct did not show any change for the better. You have thus become an incorrigible offender. Keeping this in view, it has become essential to initiate action against you in terms of Section 11 (1)/(2) of Assam Rifles Act, 2006.

3. You are hereby directed to show cause that why action to discharge you from service in terms of section 11(1)/(2) of Assam Rifles Act should not be taken against you. Please submit your reply to this Show Cause Notice within 15 days of its receipt, failing which it shall be presumed that you have no grounds to urge against the proposed action and an ex-parte decision shall be taken against you.

(Saurabh Saxena)

Col

Offg DIG Copy to:-

1. HQ DGAR (A Br, Discp Sec/Law/Rec Branch) Shillong-793010

2. Q IGAR (S) (A Br), PIN-932555, d/o 90 APO.

3. 25 Assam Rifles PIN 932 025 C/o 99 APO

4. Office Copy

Three copies of the Show Cause Notice are encl. Your are requested to return one copy of the Show Cause Notice duly signed and dated by the individual.

Received by

No.G/5013846P Rfn(GD)

Sandeep Kumar

25 Assam Rifles

Signature________________

Dated ___________________2018

CONFIDENTIAL”

4. Thus, having formed an opinion that the petitioner had become an incorrigible offender, the competent authority was of the view that it had become essential to initiate action against the petitioner in terms of Section 11 (1)/(2) of the Assam Rifles Act, 2006. The petitioner replied to the aforesaid show-cause notice on 07th August, 2018, praying for a chance to complete his service up to 20 years. There was an assurance that he would not repeat such mistake in the future.

5. By the order dated 20th October, 2018, the Brigadier, DIG Assam Rifle, Headquarters 27 Sector, had discharged the petitioner from his services w.e.f. 31st October, 2018 with a further stipulation that as per CCS Pension Rule, 1972, Rule 40(1) he would be entitled to get pension and gratuity. The order passed by the DIG, Assam Rifle is reproduced herein below for easy reference :-

OFFICE of THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, ASSAM RIFLES HEADQUARTERS 27 SECTOR ASSAM RIFLES, C/O 99 APO

ORDER

12095/4/18/133

Dated 20 Oct 2018

1 WHEREAS, it is considered that the conduct of N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top