Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH
Tilak Deka, Son Of Late Naturam Deka @ Natu Koch – Appellant
Versus
Kusharam Saharia, Son Of Late Satram Saharia – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.)
Heard Mr. BK Bhagawati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. M Hoque, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondents.
2. The supervisory jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked challenging the order dated 12.01.2024 passed by the Court of the learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division) No.1, Darrang at Mangaldai (hereinafter to be referred to as the learned Executing Court), whereby the Title Execution Case No.1/2021 was dismissed on the ground that the decree dated 10.09.2018 is an unexecutable decree. The legality and validity of the said order dated 12.01.2024 has been challenged on the ground that the learned Executing Court had failed to exercise its jurisdiction in accordance with law inasmuch as, the learned Executing Court who has the jurisdiction under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, the Code) is empowered to decide all questions relating to execution, discharge or satisfaction of the decree. Taking into account the said submission so made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, this Court finds it relevant to take note of the brief facts which led to the fi
The Executing Court has jurisdiction under Section 47 of the Code to address ambiguities in land boundaries to facilitate proper execution of decrees.
The amendment of a decree must align with the original judgment and cannot be made without notice to affected parties, as it violates principles of natural justice.
Decrees regarding immovable property must be upheld despite minor identification errors, allowing for amendments under CPC to ensure proper execution.
The executing court must effectively identify and deliver possession of decreed property according to the specifics of the execution decree.
The executing court is obligated to follow prior court directives strictly and cannot exceed its jurisdiction by issuing writs contrary to those directives.
Point of Law : A person, including a stranger, could maintain a petition under Rule 97 of Order XXI and object and get adjudication when he sought to be dispossessed by the decree holder. The express....
Point of law: If once we accept the legal position that neither a contract for sale nor a decree passed on that basis for specific performance of the contract gives any right or title to the decree-h....
A decree cannot be contested in execution if the property description was not contested in the original suit, underscoring the imperative to prevent frivolous litigation.
The Court affirmed that the Executing Court must execute decrees based on the latest valid judgment while rectifying clerical errors under Sections 47 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
