SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 1132

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH), KOHIMA BENCH
SUMAN SHYAM, KAKHETO SEMA, JJ.
State Of Nagaland, Represented By The Chief Secretary To The Government Of Nagaland And Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
Shri Shairei Raleng And Ors. – Respondents
WA No.28 Of 2024
Decided On : 09-05-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. V. Sukhrie, Addl. AG, Nagaland.
For the Respondent: N.K. Luikham, Rongli Sangtam, C.D. Rungsung.

The court established that pension rights for public servants are constitutional and must adhere to applicable rules, fixed properly without arbitrary reductions by state authorities.

Headnote:(A) Nagaland Services (ROP) Rules, 2010 - Office Memorandum dated 05-05-2017 - Pension fixation - The learned Single Judge directed refixation of pension at 50% of revised basic pay of Rs. 54,600/- based on applicable rules with arrears carrying interest at 9% till realization. Court emphasized pension is a constitutional right and cannot be reduced by executive instructions. (Paras 10, 14, 28)

(B) Applicability of ROP Rules - The court rejected appellants' argument that ROP rules do not apply to pre-2008 pensioners, indicating reliance on Fitment Table for pension calculation was legitimate. (Paras 11, 24)

(C) Pension as a constitutional right - The ruling underscored the principle that pension entitlements must adhere to established rules and cannot be arbitrarily diminished by the state. (Paras 21, 22).

Facts of the case:
The respondent No. 1 (retired Registrar) claimed his pension was improperly fixed below Rs. 27,300/- instead of Rs. 54,600/-, the latter being his corresponding revised pay scale upon retirement on 28-02-2005. He approached the court after repeated grievances went unaddressed.

Findings of Court:
The learned Single Judge's order was grounded in the ROP Rules and executive memoranda applicable to pension adjustments, affirming the importance of following due process in pension calculations.

Issues: The main issues were whether ROP Rules apply to pre-2008 pensioners and the legitimacy of the pension calculation done by the state authorities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the ROP Rules, including applicable memoranda, govern pension fixation and that dismissing the petitioner's claim based on burdensome financial implications for the state is invalid.

Result: The appeal was disposed of with directions to re-fix the pension according to the applicable provisions.

Table of Content
1. retirement pension fixation procedure based on service rules. (Para 2)
2. entitlement to revised pension rates (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments over pension calculation methods (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court analysis of pension fixation (Para 14 , 18 , 19)
5. statutory basis for pension adjustments (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
6. critique of original judgment's findings and directives. (Para 24 , 26)
7. directive to re-fix pension per law (Para 28)

JUDGMENT :

(Suman Shyam, J.)

Heard Ms. V. Sukhrie, learned Addl. Advocate General, Nagaland appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. N.K. Luikham, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1/ writ petitioner (hereinafter referred to as respondent No. 1). Mr. N. Mozhui, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

2. This intra-court appeal filed by the State of Nagaland represented by the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Nagaland as the appellant No. 1 and the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Nagaland, Finance Department, Establishment Branch (ROP Cell), Nagaland as appellant No. 2, is directed against the judgment and order dated 10-06-2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 281/2022 instituted by the respondent No. 1 as writ petitioner, whereby a direction has been issued to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to re-fix the pension of the respondent No. 1 at 50% of the revised basic pay scale of Rs. 54,600/- corresponding to pre-revised pay scale from which the writ petitioner had retired from service, within a period of 03 months from the date of production of the certified copy of the judgment and order failing which, the amount found due and payable shall carry interest @ 9% per annum till realization.

3. The facts of the case, lie in a narrow campus and therefore, are being briefly stated hereinbelow as follows:-

The respondent No. 1 had retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 28-02-2005 from the post of Registrar, Gauhati High Court, Kohima Bench. At the time of his retirement the respondent No. 1 was placed in the scale of pay of Rs. 16400-500-20900 and he was drawing the apex level of that scale at Rs. 20,900/-. His last drawn salary being Rs.31,350/-.

4. The Nagaland Services (ROP) Rules, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the ”ROP Rules, 2010”) were framed by the Govt. of Nagaland, which was originally given effect from 01-06-2008. Consequently, the decision of the Govt. of Nagaland to adopt the decision of the Govt. of India as regards revision of pension, family pension of pre-2008 pensioners/ family pensioners were also notified by the Govt. of Nagaland, Finance Department, Establishment Branch (ROP Cell) by issuing Office Memorandum dated 05-05-2017 whereby, entitlement of the pre 01-06-2008 pensioners/ family pensioners for revised pension were laid down. In the OM dated 05-05-2017, it was mentioned that the effective date for implementation of the Govt. decision shall be w.e.f. 01-06-2013 and there shall be no change in the amount of revised pension/ family pension paid during the period from 01-06-2008 to 31-05-2013 and therefore, no arrear will be payable on account of those years.

5. Thereafter, on 20-12-2017 the Govt. of Nagaland in the Finance Department, Establishment Branch (ROP Cell), had issued another OM altering the date of implementation of the revised pension/ family pension w.e.f. 01-04-2010, i.e. the date of implementation of the ROP Rules, 2010. A ready reckoner, indicating the minimum pension/ family pension for the pre 01-06-2008 pensioners/ family pensioners was also annexed to the OM dated 20-12-2017 as Annexure-I.

6. As per Annexure-I (ready reckoner) to the OM dated 20-12-2017, which was made applicable to pre 01-06-2008 pensioners/ family pensioners, the post/ grade and pay scale w.e.f. 01-06-1998 for Rs. 16400- 500-20900 would correspond to pay band/ scale of Rs. 37400-67000 with grade pay of Rs. 9000/-. The said Annexure-I had further laid down that minimum of pay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top