SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 1134

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH). 
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, J.
Smti. Junaki Mega. W/o. Tuki Mega – Petitioner 
Versus
The State Of A.P., Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary, Govt. of AP, Health And Family Welfare Deptt. and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.378 Of 2015
Decided On : 09-05-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri Sunil Mow, Shri Mudam Opo, Ms. K. Nada Maling. Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Taba Tagum, Standing Counsel, Health & Family Welfare Department, Arunachal Pradesh, Ms. Pubi Pangu, Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh.

The State is obligated to provide adequate medical facilities, and negligence in this regard, particularly during childbirth, can lead to liability for resulting harm or death, as demonstrated in this case.

Headnote:(A) Health and Family Welfare - Right to Health - Obligation of State - The court examined the failure of the District Hospital to provide adequate medical facilities, resulting in the death of the petitioner's daughter-in-law due to postpartum hemorrhage. Admission by the State concerning lack of blood bank highlighted negligence, resulting in the order for compensation of Rs. 2,50,000/- due to lack of proper health facilities and delays in treatment. (Paras 8, 19, 22)

(B) Duty of care - The appropriate health facilities must be provided to ensure safety and survival of patients, particularly during childbirth, as outlined in State's obligations to maintain health infrastructure. (Paras 18-20)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner alleged medical negligence following the death of her daughter-in-law, Miti Mega, due to complications from childbirth at a government hospital lacking necessary facilities, including a blood bank.

Issues: The primary issues addressed involved the adequacy of medical facilities provided during childbirth and the resultant complications due to negligence of hospital staff.

Findings of Court:
The court found the State authorities negligent for failing to provide essential medical infrastructure, particularly the absence of a blood bank, leading to maternal death.

Ratio Decidendi: The court opined that the lack of a blood bank constituted a failure in the duty of care towards the patient, affirming the responsibility of the state to ensure the availability of necessary health services.

Result: Writ petition allowed; compensation of Rs. 2,50,000/- directed to be paid.

Table of Content
1. negligence and lack of facilities in healthcare. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. responses and denials of health officials. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. acknowledgement of negligence due to lack of medical facility. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
4. responsibility of state for inadequate health services. (Para 22)
5. compensation to be awarded for negligence. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

(M. R. Pathak, J.)

Heard Ms. K. Nada Maling, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Taba Tagum, learned Standing Counsel, Health and Family Welfare Department, for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Also heard Ms. P. Pangu, learned Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh for the respondent No. 5.

2. The petitioner, Junaki Mega alleged that her daughter-in-law, Miti Mega wife of Amar Mega, aged about 23/24 years, after giving birth to a baby boy at District Hospital, Roing on the night of 10.07.2015, subsequently, after about 5½ hours of giving birth to her said baby, she expired on 11.07.2015, because of profuse bleeding, due to negligence committed by and on the part of the Doctors of District Hospital at Roing, Lower Dibang Valley, Arunachal Pradesh.

3. Petitioner’s daughter-in-law Miti Mega was brought to Roing District Hospital on 10.07.2015 for her delivery. Before her delivery, the doctors of the said Hospital, were aware that she was underweight and was suffering from Anemia and that precautions in that regard were taken by her. As per the Pregnant Woman Tracking Card her daughter-in-law was given 30 Iron Folic Tablet.

4. Though after delivery, her daughter-in-law being an anemic patient should have been transfused with blood and for that purpose blood should have been kept ready, but neither it was recommended by the Doctors in the said Government District Hospital at Roing, nor there was any facility of Blood Bank in the said Government Hospital. Petitioner further contended that in the entire Lower Dibang Valey, including Roing, there was no Blood Bank and even the emergency doctors, nurses and the medical staff in the said District Hospital at Roing were also not equipped with the basic facilities in case of complication during child birth by any pregnant mother or after delivery by such mothers.

5. The petitioner stated that her daughter-in-law was not placed under the supervision of any ASHA (Accredited Social Health Activist) Workers/Activist and her said daughter-in-law prior to her delivery had 3 (three) antenatal check-ups at Khonsa, Tirap District while she was with her husband Shri Amar Mega. On transfer of her son Amar Mega to Roing in the Lower Dibang Valley District, petitioner’s said daughter-in-law also came to Roing with her husband and had medical check-ups in the District Hospital at Roing.

6. It is alleged by the petitioner that during antenatal check-up had her daughter-in-law been advised by the authorities and the doctors of District Hospital at Roing to register with the ASHA Workers, she would have got the benefits of various Central and State sponsored Schemes of the Government like – Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakrama (JSSK), Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) promoting intuitional deliveries under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) and providing free and cashless delivery, including C-Sections to pregnant women and free treatment of sick new-borns with free drugs, diagnostics, diet and transport regardless of socio economic status, where those schemes have been implemented to reduce infant maternal mortality. Because of such non- advise of the doctors and staff of the District Hospital at Roing, the daughter-in- law of the petitioner could not get the benefit from ASHA Workers, nor any such benefit under JSY and/or JSSK. Petitioner stated that had her daughter-in-law been advised by the Doctors at Roing District Hospital to register with ASHA Workers, she would have also got the benefits of other Government Schemes like, National Maternity Benefit Scheme (NMBS) an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top