IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Narendra Borah S/o Late Kushram Borah - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam and Others - Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 6462 of 2024
Decided On : 25-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for payment (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on payment verification (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. directions for payment verification (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
1. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the Respondent Authorities in not making payment of the bills of the petitioner. The case of the petitioner herein is that the Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Division No. II, Guwahati, had issued eight work orders in favour of the petitioner which are (I) PHEE/G-II/TC-233(Vol-XVI/pt-V(A)2018-19/8807 dated 04.01.2019, (II) PHEE/G-II/TC-228/Vol-41/2021-22/5752 dated 27.12.2021; (III) PHEE/G-II/TC-228/Vol-41/2021-22/6380 dated 30.12.2021; IV) PHEE/G-II/TC-228/Vol-41/2021-22/8309 dated 28.01.2022; V) PHEE/G-II/TC-228/Vol-41/2022-23/6084 dated 09.12.2022; VI) PHEE/G-II/TC-228/Vol-41/2022-23/8692 dated 23.12.2022; VII) PHEE/G-II/TC-228/Vol-41/2022-23/8848 dated 26.12.2022; VIII) PHEE/G-II/TC-228/Vol-41/2022-23/8854 dated 26.12.2022. In the said formal work orders, the tender values were quoted as Rs. 1,36,957/-; Rs. 1,33,270/-; Rs. 1,15,150/-; Rs. 83,355/-; Rs. 1,35,928/-; Rs. 2,55,942/-; Rs.2,17,405/- and Rs. 3,87,411/- respectively.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner successfully executed the works and accordingly submitted the bills for the said works. As per the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to amount of Rs. 1,36,957/-; Rs. 1,33,270/-; Rs. 1,15,150/-; Rs. 83,355/-; Rs. 1,35,928/-; Rs. 2,55,942/-; Rs. 2,17,405 and Rs. 3,87,411/- thereby totaling to Rs.14,65,418/-. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had submitted various representations to the Respondent Authorities for release of the said amount however, the said amount had not been paid, for which, the petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.
3. Mr. I. Borthakur, the learned Standing Counsel, PHE Department appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted an instruction issued by the Executive Engineer, (PHE), Guwahati Division No. II, Guwahati to the effect that certain payments are due to the petitioner in respect to the works which have been duly completed by the petitioner. It has also been mentioned that after receiving the budget, the said payment would be made. The said instruction is kept on record and marked with the letter “X.”
4. Upon perusal of the materials on record, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioner had completed the works in question, the petitioner would be entitled to the amount as claimed. However, for the same, verification on the part of the Respondent Authorities would be required.
5. This Court, therefore, disposes of the instant writ petition with the following observations and directions:-
i) The Respondent Authorities shall verify as to whether the petitioner had successfully executed the said works in question as per the aforementioned work orders.
ii) The Respondent Authorities shall also verify as to whether the petitioner had submitted the requisite documents which are required for the purpose of releasing the outstanding amount as claimed by the petitioner.
iii) The Respondent Authorities shall also verify the entitlement of the petitioner to the outstanding dues, and if upon verification in the manner stated above, it is found that the petitioner is entitled to the amount claimed or any such amount, the Respondent Authorities shall pay the same to the petitioner.
iv) The said exercise be completed within a period of 6 (six) months from the date a certified copy of the instant judgment is served upon the respondent No.2, i.e. the Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Hengrabari, Dispur, Guwahati, Assam.
Respondent authorities must verify the completion of contracted works and related documentation, ensuring timely payment of outstanding dues as mandated by administrative duty and constitutional prov....
Verification of work completion is essential before payment can be issued under Article 226, ensuring entitlement to dues is accurately determined.
Entitlement to payment for completed works is contingent on verification of work execution and requisite documentation as directed by the court under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Contractual compliance verification is essential for ensuring timely payment to contractors, as established in Article 226 of the Constitution.
Public authorities are obligated to process and release payments for completed works upon verification of execution and documentation. Inaction regarding legitimate claims for completed contracts war....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.